Teams

ETC:Slammers:Megas

2026 WMA Adult 40 & Over Men · 4.0 Men 1

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-10vs LTC:McGrath/TeresoWon 21
W#1 DoublesKent Griffiths / Richard Steele vs Robert Servant / Omar Ezziddin6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAllen Fitzsimmons vs Matthew Carona5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHans Doup / Lawrence Eagan vs Christopher McGrath / Ken Shell7-5, 7-5
2026-06-09vs LTC:McGrath/TeresoLost 12
W#1 DoublesDennis McManus / Jonathan Orenstein vs Matthew Carona / Christopher McGrath6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSteven Danishevsky vs Justin Wickens5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJonathan Han / Allen Fitzsimmons vs Chad Yergeau / Robert Servant4-6, 5-7
2026-06-07vs LTC:McGrath/TeresoWon 30
W#1 DoublesJonathan Orenstein / Dennis McManus vs Christopher McGrath / Ken Shell6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Spencer / Michael Freedman vs Ken Tereso / Justin Wickens6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesT John Megas / Russell Tencer vs Chad Yergeau / Robert Servant7-5, 6-4
2026-06-06vs HRH:Amherst Gents: RocheWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Shields / Jay Kimmel vs Cameron Wiley / Christopher Seibert6-4, 4-2
W#1 SinglesJonathan Orenstein vs Patrick Roche6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSteven Danishevsky / Lawrence Eagan vs Chris Seaver / Richard Getler6-1, 6-4
2026-03-28vs HRH:Amherst Gents: RocheWon 31
W#1 DoublesDaniel Torres / Michael Freedman vs Jared Berthiaume / Ben Lewis6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJonathan Orenstein vs Patrick Roche6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJohn Spencer / Kent Griffiths vs Jason Hopkins / Cameron Wiley6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHans Doup / Richard Steele vs Christopher Seibert / Chris Ferriter7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2026-02-22vs HRH:Amherst Gents: RocheWon 31
L#1 DoublesKent Griffiths / Richard Steele vs Ben Lewis / Jared Berthiaume3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRussell Tencer vs Patrick Roche6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Freedman / Daniel Torres vs Benjamin Thompson / Chris Ferriter6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHans Doup / Dennis McManus vs Chris Seaver / Christopher Seibert6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC:Slammers:Megas0619510147
2HRH:Amherst Gents: Roche06131124226
3LTC:McGrath/Tereso0642040281

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Russell Tencer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.00
Michael Freedman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Dennis McManus
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Jonathan Orenstein
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Kent Griffiths
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Allen Fitzsimmons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.71
Hans Doup
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Richard Steele
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jay Kimmel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jonathan Han
published
Lawrence Eagan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Shields
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Danishevsky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
T John Megas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dennis McManus + Jonathan Orenstein6163% games+14.2% vs expected
Richard Steele + Michael Freedman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Russell Tencer
36W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
4.07
Michael Freedman
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Dennis McManus
59W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Jonathan Orenstein
120W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Kent Griffiths
15W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Allen Fitzsimmons
4W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Hans Doup
26W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Richard Steele
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Jay Kimmel
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
John Spencer
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jonathan Han
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lawrence Eagan
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Shields
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Steven Danishevsky
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
T John Megas
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.