Teams

A6 ACAC Davis

2021 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-31vs A3 Westwood NilsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Flournoy / Grace Kim vs Patricia Bishop / Denise Dietz2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChristina Aeinan Kang vs Molly McEvoy6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2021-07-24vs A8 Avalon KallmanWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristina Aeinan Kang vs Faith Kallman6-1, 6-3
2021-07-18vs A4 Woodlake PoindexterWon 10
W#1 DoublesGrace Kim / Christina Aeinan Kang vs Mylan Barfield / Mary Estes6-1, 6-0
2021-07-10vs A4 Woodlake PoindexterLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / Robbin Coleman vs Karen Gallegos / Stacey Cabral4-6, 2-6
2021-06-19vs A7 Bon Air MillerWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Flournoy / Grace Kim vs Robin Balsamo / Janet Miller6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesChristina Aeinan Kang vs Karin Sheets6-3, 6-0
2021-06-17vs A5 ACAC Kellner/KrebsLost 02
L#2 DoublesJennifer Flournoy / Carol Pfeiffer vs Lori Epps / Taryn Giroux5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / Robbin Coleman vs Elizabeth Coleman / Mary Knick6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Grace Kim
published 4
3.65
Christina Aeinan Kang
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Robin Griffith
published
3.34
Yasmin Lutterbie
published
3.21
Jean Davis
published
3.16
Dawn Kelsey
published 3.5
3.13
Jenna DeLigio
published
3.12
Jennifer Flournoy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Erika King
published 3.5
3.11
Carol Pfeiffer
published 3.5
3.00
Joanne Wilson
published
2.42
Robbin Coleman
published
Lisa Aaron
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Kelsey + Yasmin Lutterbie213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Grace Kim
24W–26L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Christina Aeinan Kang
157W–167L career · 6 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
Robin Griffith
31W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
Yasmin Lutterbie
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
Jean Davis
24W–23L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Dawn Kelsey
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.16
Jenna DeLigio
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Jennifer Flournoy
111W–104L career · 3 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Erika King
8W–8L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Carol Pfeiffer
9W–16L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.11
Joanne Wilson
15W–16L career · no lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.00
Robbin Coleman
1W–11L career · no lines in 2021
74%26%<1%
2.42
Lisa Aaron
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.