Teams

NWO 40&Over 4.0W Kuyama/Bloomquist-U of Findlay

2022 NWO Adult 40 & Over · NWO Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
L#1 DoublesKeyuko Kuyama / Susan Spragg vs Brenda Irwin / Amanda Paule4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMaria Little vs Hallie Williams4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Barnett / Amy Davis vs Ann Miller / Jennifer Zinz1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-08-01vs NWO 40&Over 4.0W Sanderson-SVCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaria Little / Melinda Murphy vs Elizabeth Wymer / Renee Allen0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKeyuko Kuyama vs Christina Konz3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJane Bohnlein / Rachel Barnett vs Jen Sanderson / Jennifer Walton3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesSusan Spragg / Melinda Murphy vs Jill Gauthier / Tina Nordyke6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKeyuko Kuyama / Rachel Barnett vs Sara Johnson / Patti Savage-McNamara4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Bohnlein / Jane Heck vs Dana Loeb / Didi Thomason0-6, 2-6
2022-07-15vs NWO 40&Over 4.0W Ward/Cameron-TTCLost 13
W#1 DoublesKeyuko Kuyama / Amy Davis vs Sarah Ward / Emily Nixon6-7, 5-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSusan Spragg vs Carrie Zanville1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Miller / Rachel Barnett vs Jennifer Morgan / Angela Langevin5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Tam / Patricia Naus vs Dawn Cameron / Janet Daniel6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSusan Spragg vs Missy Rothweiler0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJane Heck / Melinda Murphy vs Mandy Ray / Keri Buff6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGretchen Leu / Keyuko Kuyama vs Brenda Scott / Hillary Anne Walters4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-05vs NWO 40&Over 4.0W Riffer-PTCWon 31
L#1 DoublesChristina Tam / Karen Hoban vs Rebecca Swartzbeck / Nancy Cheatwood6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKeyuko Kuyama vs Lisa Evans6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMelinda Murphy / Jane Heck vs Jane Chang / Susan Herring6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDebra Bloomquist / Patricia Naus vs Kelly Kessler / Patricia Falk7-6, 6-3
L#1 DoublesChristina Tam / Amy Davis vs Brenda Irwin / Amy Young6-7, 5-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKeyuko Kuyama vs Hallie Williams3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRachel Barnett / Karen Hoban vs Kathleen Hire / Ann Miller7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJane Heck / Patricia Naus vs Jennifer Zinz / Donna Engel1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-08vs NWO 40&Over 4.0W Sanderson-SVCLost 13
L#1 DoublesMaria Little / Amy Davis vs Denise Nisbett / Elizabeth Wymer2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesChristina Tam vs Jennifer Walton6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Barnett / Keyuko Kuyama vs Jen Sanderson / Renee Allen3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Bloomquist / Gretchen Leu vs Andrea Wymer / Jennifer Kraus0-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesMelinda Murphy / Keyuko Kuyama vs Melissa Hill / Theresa Vietmeier6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKaren Hoban vs Julieann Campbell6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChristina Tam / Patricia Naus vs Dana Loeb / Didi Thomason6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaria Little / Rachel Barnett vs Tina Nordyke / Nikki Mitchell4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesKaren Hoban / Melinda Murphy vs Stacey Kiel / Keri Buff6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKeyuko Kuyama vs Hillary Anne Walters6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmy Davis / Gretchen Leu vs Christine Gohr / Rosanna Wong4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-05-17vs NWO 40&Over 4.0W Riffer-PTCLost 13
L#1 DoublesChristina Tam / Patricia Naus vs Nancy Cheatwood / Mary Hire4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesSusan Spragg vs Lisa Evans6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDebra Bloomquist / Melinda Murphy vs Susan Herring / Eileen Riffer3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJane Heck / Jane Bohnlein vs Jane Chang / Patricia Falk6-4, 7-6
2022-05-03vs NWO 40&Over 4.0W Ward/Cameron-TTCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSusan Spragg / Nancy Miller vs Sarah Ward / Emily Nixon1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKeyuko Kuyama vs Carrie Zanville0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaria Little / Rachel Barnett vs Dawn Cameron / Jennifer Morgan6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelinda Murphy / Karen Hoban vs Angela Langevin / Janet Daniel6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NWO Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWO 40&Over 4.0W Sanderson-SVC12039926324
2NWO 40&Over 4.0W Loeb/Flickinger-TWOS84252348398
3NWO 40&Over 4.0W McCullough/Young- PTC75282048425
4NWO 40&Over 4.0W Ray/Rothweiler-PTC66272149423
5NWO 40&Over 4.0W Ward/Cameron-TTC48212760434
6NWO 40&Over 4.0W Kuyama/Bloomquist-U of Findlay48202863460
7NWO 40&Over 4.0W Riffer-PTC11184084545

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Keyuko Kuyama
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.67
Susan Spragg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.61
Christina Tam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.28
Maria Little
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.26
Gretchen Leu
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Jane Bohnlein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Debra Bloomquist
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jane Heck
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Karen Hoban
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Melinda Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Patricia Naus
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 0
Rachel Barnett
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Heck + Jane Bohnlein4449% games+1.5% vs expected
Jane Heck + Melinda Murphy5159% games−1.1% vs expected
Susan Spragg + Keyuko Kuyama3350% games−1.2% vs expected
Patricia Naus + Christina Tam81049% games−2.0% vs expected
Keyuko Kuyama + Christina Tam2444% games−4.7% vs expected
Debra Bloomquist + Patricia Naus4349% games−6.6% vs expected
Karen Hoban + Melinda Murphy224 matchesnot enough data
Debra Bloomquist + Keyuko Kuyama044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Keyuko Kuyama
174W–152L career · 11 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Susan Spragg
92W–65L career · 6 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Christina Tam
109W–91L career · 6 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
Maria Little
30W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Gretchen Leu
26W–34L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Jane Bohnlein
69W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.09
3
Debra Bloomquist
74W–70L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
Jane Heck
41W–21L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Hoban
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melinda Murphy
31W–22L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
0
Patricia Naus
233W–89L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Barnett
71W–47L career · 13 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.