Teams

IRV-Lux

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.11 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Ry Koteen
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 4.5
3.95
Justin Ford
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.94
Tom Lux
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.90
Alex Simpson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.82
Max Breslau
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
David Finkelman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Soren Coughlin-Glaser
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Brian Hendrickson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.36
Terence Gariety
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2020-03-08Won 31
W#1 SinglesTom Lux vs Matt Brown6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRy Koteen / Soren Coughlin-Glaser vs Honorato Wenceslao / Ronald Jackson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMax Breslau vs Brian Theobald6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrian Hendrickson / Alex Simpson vs Brian Dehen / Jeroen Swanborn1-6, 6-0, 1-0
2020-03-01Lost 04
L#1 DoublesDavid Finkelman / Ry Koteen vs Rudd McGarity / David Tinsley7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBrian Hendrickson vs Adrien Leemin6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTom Lux / James Fenner vs Justin Greene / Chris Rivera6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAlex Simpson vs Amahal Barbee6-2, 6-2
2020-02-22Lost 05
L#1 DoublesDavid Finkelman / Soren Coughlin-Glaser vs Jeremy Morris / David Tinsley6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRy Koteen vs Adrien Leemin6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJames Fenner / Tom Lux vs Todd Klindt / Justin Greene7-6, 7-5
L#2 SinglesBrian Hendrickson vs Erik Lim6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTerence Gariety / Peter Brown vs Jeb Hubbs / Charlie Hyde IV6-1, 6-2
2020-02-14Won 21
L#1 DoublesSoren Coughlin-Glaser / Ry Koteen vs Charles Tran / Trung Huynh7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJames Fenner / Tom Lux vs Jim Rankin / Benjamin Doan6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJustin Ford / Brian Hendrickson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2020-02-09Lost 04
L#1 DoublesRy Koteen / Justin Ford vs Anthony Nelson / Jeff Berman6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Finkelman / Brian Sinclair vs James Feeney / Cord Speelman7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesBrian Hendrickson vs Tyler Shoemaker6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTom Lux / Max Breslau vs Peter Aleman / Shung Shin6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2020-01-25Won 21
W#1 DoublesRy Koteen / Soren Coughlin-Glaser vs Philip Paccione / Jake Samiano7-5, 7-5
L#2 SinglesMax Breslau vs Franklin Truong6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Finkelman / Justin Ford vs Shane Wilson / Issei Saida6-4, 6-3
2020-01-19Lost 04
L#1 DoublesSoren Coughlin-Glaser / Ry Koteen vs Charles Gates / Josh Greene7-5, 7-6
L#1 SinglesAlex Simpson vs Thomas Schaap6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesTom Lux vs Alex Hart6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJustin Ford / Brian Hendrickson vs Hau Bui / Erik Rhodes6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Ry Koteen
49W–49L career
19%81%0%
4.02
4.5
Justin Ford
22W–32L career
27%73%0%
3.95
4
Tom Lux
75W–45L career
0%90%10%
3.94
4.5
Alex Simpson
34W–53L career
41%59%0%
3.90
4
Max Breslau
5W–9L career · type S
2%92%6%
3.82
4
David Finkelman
23W–32L career
4%91%6%
3.80
4
Soren Coughlin-Glaser
18W–27L career
not enough data
4
Brian Hendrickson
23W–50L career
2%97%0%
3.70
3.5
Terence Gariety
76W–80L career
0%98%2%
3.36

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.