Teams

9 Raintree Massengill

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-04vs 3 ACAC LitzSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlexis Bullard / Erin Lyons vs Jennifer Funk / Deanne Ralston7-6, 4-2
L#2 SinglesAmy Boschen vs Rebecca Cassilly3-6, 1-6
2022-05-28vs 5 Salisbury Jamison JamLost 01
L#2 SinglesAmy Boschen vs Karin Speizer6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-05-21vs 22 Willow Oaks Knierim/ChenaultWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Boschen / Peggy Bryan vs Katie Bressler / Gretchen DeFrancesca6-0, 6-0
2022-05-15vs 12 ACAC TandettLost 01
L#3 DoublesErin Lyons / Elizabeth Updike vs Diane Reale / Lori Strobl2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-30vs 2 Woodlake PhelpsWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Boschen / Kerry Kablack vs Taryn Giroux / Meaco Coffey6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesPeggy Bryan / Erin Lyons vs Julia Morrison / Laura Brawley6-0, 6-1
2022-04-23Won 10
W#2 SinglesAmy Boschen vs Gisele Aboujaoude6-3, 5-4
2022-04-16vs 24 MTC RhodesWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlexis Bullard / Amy Boschen vs Charlotte Rhodes / Suzanne Johnson6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJean Cheek / Erin Lyons vs Kelsey Felton / Renee Dickey6-3, 6-0
2022-04-09vs 21 Kings Charter SurrattWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Boschen / Peggy Bryan vs Cheryl Koenig / Ariel Koenig6-2, 6-2
2022-04-03vs 18 Avalon Ghita 3.0 WomenLost 02
L#1 SinglesAmy Boschen vs Emily Mason4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesErin Lyons / Molly Smith vs Anna Baird / Jennifer Manring6-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Rebecca Schwartz
published
3.25
Shannon Foster
published
2.89
Peggy Bryan
published
2.87
Amy Boschen
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published 3
2.80
2.77
Jean Cheek
published
2.74
Erin Lyons
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.72
Alexis Bullard
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexis Bullard + Peggy Bryan3252% games+1.4% vs expected
Peggy Bryan + Geetanjali Kidambi224 matchesnot enough data
Alexis Bullard + Amy Boschen123 matchesnot enough data
Peggy Bryan + Amy Boschen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Schwartz
9W–18L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Shannon Foster
15W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Peggy Bryan
28W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Amy Boschen
154W–164L career · 16 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Geetanjali Kidambi
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Jean Cheek
27W–17L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Erin Lyons
87W–117L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Alexis Bullard
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.