Teams

Smiles and Laughs

2024 Montgomery Tri-Level 18 & Over · Montgomery Tri-Level 5.0, 4.5, 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule15 played
2024-09-19vs MONTGOMERY - LieberLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Hosie / Abdul Jordan vs Mehrban Iranshad / David Segarra Rius4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnthony Busch / Lukas Sanidas vs Aravind Krishna / Jamie Mccardell2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Erdely / Bradley Jacques vs Shuang Chen / Anthony McGovern4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-09-19vs MONTGOMERY - LieberLost 01
L#2 DoublesEric Getzinger / Derek Ireland vs Mehrban Iranshad / Jamie Mccardell6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-09-16vs MONTGOMERY - LieberLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Hosie / Abdul Jordan vs Landon Schaefer / David Segarra Rius0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDerek Ireland / Eric Getzinger vs Mehrban Iranshad / Jamie Mccardell3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDat Doan / Bradley Jacques vs Shuang Chen / David Todd4-6, 2-6
2024-09-16vs MONTGOMERY - ChenLost 01
L#1 DoublesDerek Ireland / Henry Cha vs Johan Holmberg / Michael Mahaney2-6, 4-6
2024-09-05vs MONTGOMERY - LieberLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatthew Geppi / James Hosie vs Chris Czerwinski / Juan Borga3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEric Getzinger / Derek Ireland vs Nicholas McMurray / Reginald Tull4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDat Doan / Michael Erdely vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesQi Hua / Lukas Sanidas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-27vs MONTGOMERY - LieberLost 02
L#2 DoublesDerek Ireland / Lukas Sanidas vs Sheikh Ahmed / Mehrban Iranshad2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAnthony Busch / Bradley Jacques vs Amir Moinfar / David Todd1-6, 1-6
2024-08-26vs MONTGOMERY - ChenLost 01
L#1 DoublesHenry Cha / Derek Ireland vs Yiran Liu / Changfu Xiao6-7, 4-6
2024-08-19vs MONTGOMERY - LieberLost 01
L#3 DoublesDat Doan / Bradley Jacques vs Quentin Carter / Fa-Yueh Hung1-6, 2-6
2024-08-19vs I'd Hit That HighLost 01
L#1 DoublesLukas Sanidas / Abdoul Miloud Agbere vs Luis Lozano / Aravind Krishna2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-08-19vs MONTGOMERY - LieberLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Hosie / Matthew Geppi vs Matt Stillwagon / Landon Schaefer2-6, 3-6
2024-08-05vs MONTGOMERY - LieberLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Hosie / Abdul Jordan vs Austin Longacre / Matt Stillwagon2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAnthony Busch / Bradley Jacques vs Shuang Chen / Fa-Yueh Hung0-6, 1-6
2024-08-03vs MONTGOMERY - LieberLost 02
L#2 DoublesLoc-Anh Nguyen-Khoa / Dat Doan vs Ryan Cinoman / Aravind Krishna1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Erdely / Bradley Jacques vs Siddhanth Iyer / Amir Moinfar1-6, 5-7
2024-07-27vs I'd Hit That HighWon 10
W#1 DoublesAbdoul Miloud Agbere / Lukas Sanidas vs Derek Ireland / Luis Lozano4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-15vs MONTGOMERY - ChenLost 01
L#1 DoublesHenry Cha / Derek Ireland vs Yiran Liu / Changfu Xiao2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Tri-Level 5.0, 4.5, 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Austin Blake
published 5
4.63
Gregory Rabinovich
published
4.41
James Hosie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.37
Matthew Geppi
published 4.5
4.13
Lukas Sanidas
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.12
Hong Hu
published
3.99
Derek Ireland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.97
Kevin Dowdell
published
3.81
Dat Doan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Loc-Anh Nguyen-Khoa
published
3.72
Michael Erdely
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Bradley Jacques
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Erdely + Bradley Jacques3540% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Geppi + Bradley Jacques224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Austin Blake
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.71
Gregory Rabinovich
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.63
4.5
James Hosie
52W–41L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
4.41
4.5
Matthew Geppi
225W–81L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
4.37
4.5
Lukas Sanidas
142W–110L career · 5 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
4.13
Hong Hu
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Derek Ireland
89W–146L career · 8 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.99
Kevin Dowdell
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.97
4
Dat Doan
136W–155L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Loc-Anh Nguyen-Khoa
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Michael Erdely
206W–159L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Bradley Jacques
192W–206L career · 6 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.