Teams

West Shore at Messiah - Wilfong

2021 USTA 40 & Over League · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-23vs Hbg Academy - HopwoodWon 31
W#1 DoublesKaren Burleson / Dawn Toutkaldjian vs Melissa Ruggiero / Sowmya Surapaneni6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJane Acquilano vs Teague Wright6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCindee Trapp / Laura Lanza vs Carolyn Hopwood / Beth McCrea6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCindy Wilfong / Jane Ackerman vs Kateri Martin / Lisa Frick6-1, 6-2
2021-08-19vs Hershey - CorcoranSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDawn Toutkaldjian / Cindee Trapp vs Gretchen Yarnall / Michele Harnden5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLaura Lanza vs Jennifer Tsotakos7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCindy Wilfong / Jane Ackerman vs Shannon Corcoran / Maral Vartan2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeborah Klenotic / Mary Silva vs Jennifer Craven / Bonnie Keating3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-08-18Won 20
W#2 DoublesTracy Evens / Deborah Klenotic vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJane Ackerman / Cindy Wilfong vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-08-04vs Wisehaven - MichelsWon 40
W#1 DoublesKaren Burleson / Dawn Toutkaldjian vs Lynne Beck / Marianne Michels6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLaura Lanza vs Darlene Ashwood6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCindee Trapp / Cindy Wilfong vs Julie Schedin / Angela Witta3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJane Ackerman / Deborah Klenotic vs Mary Chodroff / Sheryl Stoll6-1, 6-2
2021-07-28vs Hempfield - CovellLost 13
W#1 DoublesLaura Lanza / Cindee Trapp vs Toni Hamlett / Jody Wilson6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJane Acquilano vs Michele Mccartney5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Klenotic / Cindy Wilfong vs Irene Acosta / Terri Mrozinski2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJane Ackerman / Tracy Evens vs Debora Covell / Alexandra Short5-7, 3-6
2021-07-21vs Hempfield - ForreyWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Burleson / Dawn Toutkaldjian vs Colleen Funk / Becky Katz6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJane Acquilano vs Heather Arters6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLaura Lanza / Cindee Trapp vs Pamela Oleksa / Marla Triano6-0, 6-0
2021-07-06vs Hempfield - HuntWon 31
W#1 DoublesKaren Burleson / Dawn Toutkaldjian vs Susan Eurich / Tricia Sollenberger6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJane Acquilano vs Kayoko Hollinger3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Lanza / Nonglak Steele vs Lori Hunt / Tracy Schmitt7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSherry Greer / Cindee Trapp vs Beth McCormick / Joanne Hess6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-23vs Lanc CC - O'OconorSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJane Acquilano / Dawn Toutkaldjian vs Sarah Kline / Suzanne Woodard6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLaura Lanza vs Rosana Mann6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCindee Trapp / Nonglak Steele vs Barbara Newman / Alissa Larkin6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Klenotic / Cindy Wilfong vs Heather Spire / Beth Rice6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Jane Acquilano
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.88
Laura Lanza
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.79
Cindee Trapp
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.78
Deborah Klenotic
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
Dawn Toutkaldjian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Jane Ackerman
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Cindy Wilfong
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Karen Burleson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nonglak Steele
published
Sherry Greer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Lanza + Cindee Trapp5259% games+5.9% vs expected
Deborah Klenotic + Dawn Toutkaldjian5354% games+5.7% vs expected
Cindee Trapp + Dawn Toutkaldjian131349% games+1.3% vs expected
Cindy Wilfong + Jane Ackerman4355% games+0.8% vs expected
Jane Acquilano + Cindee Trapp141350% games−2.2% vs expected
Deborah Klenotic + Jane Ackerman3257% games−2.4% vs expected
Karen Burleson + Dawn Toutkaldjian15460% games−4.8% vs expected
Jane Acquilano + Dawn Toutkaldjian2447% games−7.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jane Acquilano
134W–97L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Laura Lanza
228W–167L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Cindee Trapp
115W–100L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Deborah Klenotic
95W–74L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Dawn Toutkaldjian
182W–118L career · 6 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Jane Ackerman
29W–46L career · 5 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
Cindy Wilfong
23W–17L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Burleson
42W–30L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nonglak Steele
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sherry Greer
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.