Teams

EAnderson (Queens)

2026 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule20 played
2026-08-03vs KDavis (Queens)Won 30
W#1 SinglesEmilia Anderson vs Rhoda Juckett6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesDevon Fuller vs Dhenisha Bissoon6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRACHEL Patterson vs Stephanie Qunbar6-3, 6-0
2026-07-29vs JMugnano (Queens)Won 30
W#1 SinglesDaniella James vs Krisha Blanchard6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLeah Hackworth vs Erika Myers6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJulia Orski vs Melissa Kaufman6-4, 6-2
2026-07-22Won 10
W#3 SinglesEmilia Anderson vs Kim Gissy6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-15vs RWright (Queens)Won 20
W#1 SinglesDaniella James vs Jennifer Siddall6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesEmma SEGAL vs Raegan Wright6-0, 6-0
2026-07-14vs ASu (Life Time)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesEmilia Anderson vs Viktoriia Kologryva4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDevon Fuller vs Anait Balasanyan6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesDaniella James vs Rongrong Wang7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-10Lost 01
L#3 SinglesMadelynn Bates vs Jessica Walker4-6, 3-6
2026-07-08vs KCronin/JJoliet (Piper Glen)Won 30
W#1 SinglesDevon Fuller vs Trisha Smith6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDaniella James vs Kathy Harborne7-5, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMadelynn Bates vs Katie Bissett7-6, 6-1
2026-07-08Split 11
W#2 SinglesDevon Fuller vs Lori DiFazio6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesDaniella James vs Hillary Kroboth2-6, 6-7
2026-07-03Won 10
W#2 SinglesMadelynn Bates vs Sun Moon6-0, 6-4
2026-07-01Won 10
W#3 SinglesEmma SEGAL vs Annie Hart6-1, 6-0
2026-06-30vs CArevalo/ZMarenic (Park Road)Won 30
W#1 SinglesDevon Fuller vs Catie Beth Bishop6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesEmilia Anderson vs Zahide Marenic7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesEmma SEGAL vs Mary Gross6-3, 6-0
2026-06-23vs SGanesan (Blakeney)Won 21
W#1 SinglesEmma SEGAL vs Lorena Giraldo6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMadelynn Bates vs Caitlin Bailey6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesKatherine Epler vs Radhika Jampani3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-16vs RWright (Queens)Won 30
W#1 SinglesDevon Fuller vs Jessica Zhang6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesEmilia Anderson vs Brittani Luoni6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMadelynn Bates vs Raegan Wright6-2, 6-3
2026-06-09vs DCallinan/KGibson (Raintree)Won 21
L#1 SinglesJulia Orski vs Krista Gibson2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLeah Hackworth vs Marie Foley6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMadelynn Bates vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-06vs SDeVries (PCC)Won 20
W#2 SinglesMadelynn Bates vs Michael Nova6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesRACHEL Patterson vs Melissa Pavlovich6-1, 6-1
2026-06-03Won 10
W#2 SinglesDevon Fuller vs Melanie Rebosa7-6, 6-0
2026-06-02vs MCBrown (Veterans Park)Won 20
W#1 SinglesDaniella James vs Courtney Stallmann3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesEmma SEGAL vs Haley Kuyk6-2, 6-2
2026-05-29Won 10
W#1 SinglesDevon Fuller vs Lauren Smith7-6, 6-3
2026-05-20Lost 02
L#1 SinglesEmilia Anderson vs Molly Donohue5-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesDevon Fuller vs Cynthia Hoover3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-05-19vs KWagner (Park Road)Won 21
W#1 SinglesDaniella James vs Haylie Lian6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesEmilia Anderson vs Luz Lim6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesKatherine Epler vs Linda Jo Mastrangelo6-2, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Devon Fuller
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 44% · published 3
3.14
Daniella James
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 3
3.10
Emma SEGAL
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
3.05
Emilia Anderson
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.01
Leah Hackworth
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
3.00
Madelynn Bates
usually #3 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3
2.66
RACHEL Patterson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.65
Julia Orski
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Katherine Epler
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Hackworth + Daniella James5071% games+19.2% vs expected
Emma SEGAL + Emilia Anderson7168% games+8.6% vs expected
Emma SEGAL + Devon Fuller404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Devon Fuller
96W–37L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.32
3
Daniella James
37W–10L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.14
3
Emma SEGAL
28W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Emilia Anderson
37W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.05
3
Leah Hackworth
43W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Madelynn Bates
53W–35L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
RACHEL Patterson
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
Julia Orski
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Katherine Epler
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.