Teams

Lob'em and Leave'em

Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women DelChes - Tues

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-16vs Waynesborough 2.5 18+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEleanor McNulty / Amy Spracklin vs Alyssa Pianelli / Stina Carter5-7, 3-6
2026-06-09vs Get a GripLost 12
L#1 DoublesEleanor McNulty / Monica Marks vs Jill Hanawalt / Kerry Lundmark0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSharon Dugan vs Allison Tuscano6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMackenzie Hendrickson / Jennifer Griffiths vs Lois Burkey / Jacqueline Rearden1-6, 1-6
2026-06-02vs Volley GirlsLost 12
L#1 DoublesDawn Hamilton / Theresa Wilson vs Pamela Tedesco / Dawn George6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMonica Marks vs Lisa Mccartney0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Spracklin / Eleanor McNulty vs Lisa McTear / Elena Flores-Noel6-3, 6-4
2026-05-19vs Net ProfitsLost 03
L#1 DoublesEleanor McNulty / Sharon Dugan vs Adriana Fazio / Vickie Piersimoni5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Griffiths vs Daljit Bhogal1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Spracklin / Jessica Smith vs Ashlyn Vance / Nancy Hovanic5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2026-05-12vs Cup 10 BallersWon 20
W#1 DoublesTheresa Wilson / Dawn Hamilton vs Lauren Wigoda / Rebecca Benfield6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Rose / Mackenzie Hendrickson vs Stephanie Edginton / Candace Gordon6-2, 7-6
2026-05-05vs Set2WinWon 21
L#1 DoublesEleanor McNulty / Jessica Smith vs Ana Fernandez / Beth Burns2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSharon Dugan vs Regan Kreszswick6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Griffiths / Monica Marks vs Anne Supina / Mita Chatterjee6-2, 7-6
2026-04-28vs Ace Ace BabyWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Spracklin / Jessica Smith vs Julie MacArthur / Tiffany Giltner3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJennifer Griffiths vs Carol Devlin6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEleanor McNulty / Sharon Dugan vs Lara Ciesinski / Jonida Mandarano6-0, 6-3
2026-04-21vs Drop Shots - KorsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesDawn Hamilton / Theresa Wilson vs Ann Colby-cummings / Samantha Himmelstein3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMonica Marks vs Ashley Trotter3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Griffiths / Sharon Dugan vs Farren Maillie / Colleen Staico2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 2.5 Women DelChes - Tues
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cup 10 Ballers0631530195
2Waynesborough 2.5 18+0714717158
3BCRC Bad Aces0791224193
4Drop Shots - Wells0818615154
5Sets and the City08131125206
6Drop Shots - Korson08121227191
7Lob'em and Leave'em08111328218
8Baby got BACKHAND08121228219
9Cynwyd Rising Racquets08111330192
10HPTA AD-IN0891531211
11Lemon Drop Shots08101431220
12Luv Luv Kiss Kiss0851939256
13St Albans Wise Aces0918924230
14Stingers09101734240
15The Racquettes0991837245

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.46
Teri Gabrys
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.39
Jennifer Griffiths
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.38
Sharon Dugan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Alexandra Rose
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.17
Dawn Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.93
Amy Spracklin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.92
Eleanor McNulty
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.81
Monica Marks
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jessica Smith
published
Mackenzie Hendrickson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Theresa Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Hamilton + Teri Gabrys122742% games+2.4% vs expected
Teri Gabrys + Theresa Wilson5743% games−6.4% vs expected
Dawn Hamilton + Theresa Wilson1529% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Smith + Amy Spracklin044 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Wilson + Eleanor McNulty213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Spracklin + Eleanor McNulty123 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Griffiths + Monica Marks123 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Griffiths + Eleanor McNulty033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teri Gabrys
36W–102L career · 4 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.46
Jennifer Griffiths
3W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Sharon Dugan
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Alexandra Rose
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Dawn Hamilton
24W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Amy Spracklin
3W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Eleanor McNulty
20W–80L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Monica Marks
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.81
Jessica Smith
4W–24L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mackenzie Hendrickson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Theresa Wilson
23W–47L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.