Teams

PHXWILD/Abney/40&O/9.0X

2024 SPRING Mixed 40 & Over - CAZ · 9.0 Mixed 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 4.22 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-02vs PHX/JohnsonMorgan/40&O/MIX9.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAditya Sharma / Tammy Anderson vs Cort Alcott / Jessica Navarro6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Pacione / Derek Seibert vs Jose Rojas / Valerie Andrus2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Abney / Patty Juhl vs Joe Johnson / Drisa Carrizo6-7, 3-6
2024-06-02vs PHX/JohnsonMorgan/40&O/MIX9.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesAditya Sharma / Tammy Anderson vs Kristin Morgan / Cort Alcott6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Pacione / Derek Seibert vs Drisa Carrizo / Joe Johnson3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCraig Abney / Patty Juhl vs Valerie Andrus / Jorge Franco1-6, 2-6
2024-05-19vs PHX/JohnsonMorgan/40&O/MIX9.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTammy Anderson / Bao Nguyen vs Peter Gladkin / Beth Kaper3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCraig Abney / Cheri Quesenberry vs Julie Stelse / Todd Sutton2-6, 4-6
2024-05-19vs PHX/JohnsonMorgan/40&O/MIX9.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBao Nguyen / Cheri Quesenberry vs Christopher DeRosa / Kristin Morgan6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTammy Anderson / Aditya Sharma vs Robin Parmley / Matthew Jackson2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCraig Abney / Cindy Blair vs Beth Kaper / Saman Rezaie1-6, 2-6
2024-04-28vs PHX/JohnsonMorgan/40&O/MIX9.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTammy Anderson / Aditya Sharma vs Saman Rezaie / Julie Stelse3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDerek Seibert / Michelle Pacione vs Christine Veitzer / Christopher DeRosa1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Richardson / Daniel Richardson vs Peter Gladkin / Jessica Navarro1-6, 1-6
2024-04-28vs PHX/JohnsonMorgan/40&O/MIX9.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTammy Anderson / Aditya Sharma vs Christopher DeRosa / Christine Veitzer6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDerek Seibert / Cindy Blair vs Peter Gladkin / Beth Kaper2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Abney / Tina Bond vs Cort Alcott / Julie Stelse2-6, 3-6
2024-04-21vs PHX/JohnsonMorgan/40&O/MIX9.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDerek Seibert / Tammy Anderson vs Todd Sutton / Jessica Navarro1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCraig Abney / Cheri Quesenberry vs Ryu Iwai / Christine Veitzer2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAditya Sharma / Cindy Blair vs Jorge Franco / Robin Parmley3-6, 4-6
2024-04-21vs PHX/JohnsonMorgan/40&O/MIX9.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDerek Seibert / Tina Bond vs Todd Sutton / Jessica Navarro1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Abney / Tammy Anderson vs Jose Rojas / Christine Veitzer1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCheri Quesenberry / Aditya Sharma vs Saman Rezaie / Drisa Carrizo3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Mixed 40 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PHX/JohnsonMorgan/40&O/MIX9.07120411142
2PHXWILD/Abney/40&O/9.0X1742043275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Cheri Quesenberry
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
Bao Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Michelle Pacione
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Denise Richardson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Cindy Blair
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Aditya Sharma
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.92
Patty Juhl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Derek Seibert
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.61
Camilla Harrison
published 4
3.51
Craig Abney
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 4
3.46
Daniel Richardson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Tina Bond
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Derek Seibert + Michelle Pacione4742% games−6.6% vs expected
Craig Abney + Patty Juhl4353% games−8.3% vs expected
Denise Richardson + Derek Seibert4258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cheri Quesenberry
68W–40L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
4.36
4.5
Bao Nguyen
21W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Pacione
74W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Denise Richardson
63W–40L career · 1 line in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Cindy Blair
96W–68L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Aditya Sharma
107W–88L career · 9 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
4.08
Patty Juhl
64W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.92
4
Derek Seibert
86W–134L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Camilla Harrison
123W–168L career · no lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
3.61
4
Craig Abney
173W–248L career · 11 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Daniel Richardson
40W–53L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
Tina Bond
87W–55L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.