Teams

GSTL 3.5 Mixed 18 & Over (Elswick)

2026 Mixed 18 & Over - GSTL · 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-15vs GSTL18/Phillips/DunesWon 21
L#1 DoublesCameron McLemore / Amy Canavan vs Radley Short / Sarah Prinzi2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCaroline Zito / Justice DeFreest vs Jennifer Phillips / Gabriel Phillips7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAllison Stefaniuk / Dean Kolenbrener vs Travis Bary / Maggie Langdale1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-30vs GSTL18/Hale/PrestwickLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Canavan / Roberto Ferraro vs Cory Brown / Matthew Hale6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMadison Barrett / Lauren Jensen vs Lawson Davis / Clare McLaurin5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesOlivia Elswick / Dean Kolenbrener vs Chris Denny / Allison DeVaux6-3, 6-2
2026-06-23vs GSTL18/Roy/Surf ClubWon 20
W#1 DoublesOlivia Elswick / Justice DeFreest vs Gina Vetrino / Scott Leroux6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRenee Barrett / Madison Barrett vs Skylar Dale / Michael Holland6-2, 6-4
2026-06-16vs GSTL18/Phillips/DunesWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaroline Zito / Cameron McLemore vs Maggie Langdale / Christopher Boullion6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Canavan / Justice DeFreest vs Pamela Yates / Brett Yates3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAllison Stefaniuk / Tom McKeever vs Jennifer Phillips / Gabriel Phillips6-1, 7-5
2026-06-09vs GSTL18/Hale/PrestwickWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Canavan / Daniel Fedele vs Allison DeVaux / Pete Davis7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRenee Barrett / Roberto Ferraro vs Audra Lee / Douglas Bradshaw6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRenee Nisbet / Todd Nisbet vs Laurie Denny / Matthew Hale6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-02vs GSTL18/Roy/Surf ClubWon 30
W#1 DoublesOlivia Elswick / Daniel Fedele vs Tonya Fitzgerald / Scott Leroux4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDean Kolenbrener / Caroline Zito vs Alli Beane / Michael Holland6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTodd Nisbet / Renee Nisbet vs Chad Tingen / Gina Vetrino6-3, 6-0
2026-05-26vs GSTL18/Phillips/DunesWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadison Barrett / Olivia Elswick vs Becky Walls / Patrick Sparks6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Canavan / Roberto Ferraro vs Sandra Valentine / E Lawrence Langdale6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTom McKeever / Lauren Jensen vs Radley Short / Sarah Prinzi0-6, 1-6
2026-05-19vs GSTL18/Hale/PrestwickWon 21
W#1 DoublesDean Kolenbrener / Allison Stefaniuk vs Amar Patel / Allison DeVaux6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMadison Barrett / Renee Barrett vs Douglas Bradshaw / Laurie Denny6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTodd Nisbet / Renee Nisbet vs Chris Denny / Audra Lee6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Madison Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.47
Dean Kolenbrener
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Allison Stefaniuk
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Caroline Zito
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Daniel Fedele
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Cameron McLemore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Olivia Elswick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Roberto Ferraro
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.06
Amy Canavan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.97
Justice DeFreest
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Renee Nisbet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Tom McKeever
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Renee Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Lauren Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Todd Nisbet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Nisbet + Todd Nisbet5556% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Fedele + Amy Canavan404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madison Barrett
17W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Dean Kolenbrener
7W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Allison Stefaniuk
32W–17L career · type D · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Caroline Zito
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Daniel Fedele
15W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cameron McLemore
1W–1L career · type T · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Olivia Elswick
17W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.11
Roberto Ferraro
16W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Amy Canavan
31W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Justice DeFreest
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.97
Renee Nisbet
15W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Tom McKeever
18W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
Renee Barrett
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
2.87
Lauren Jensen
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
Todd Nisbet
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.