Teams

Team Tiong

2022 Loudoun Tri-Level Men · Loudoun Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-18vs Team MelisWon 10
W#3 DoublesTHUC NGUYEN / Andrew Tsai vs Ahmed Hussain / Scott Hataway6-3, 6-2
2022-11-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew Tsai / James Rentsch vs Thomas Jefferson / Paul Houpert7-6, 6-3
2022-11-08vs Team MelisWon 10
W#3 DoublesAudie Blancaflor / James Rentsch vs Thomas Jefferson / Benny Lam6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-10-28vs Team MelisWon 21
L#1 DoublesYong Kim / Ryan Rohn vs Andrew Han / Shadab Khan2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPaul Joseph / Edward Xin vs Dante Paragas / Chris Panagides7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJames Rentsch / Douglas Thede vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-28vs Team MelisWon 10
W#3 DoublesTHUC NGUYEN / James Rentsch vs John Back / Scott Hataway7-6, 4-3
2022-10-25vs Team MelisLost 02
L#1 DoublesRyan Rohn / Edward Xin vs Shadab Khan / Justin Lee6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTHUC NGUYEN / Andrew Tsai vs Scott Hataway / Benny Lam2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Edward Xin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Ryan Rohn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Rishi Malhotra
published
3.54
Chris Bokel
published 3.5
3.38
Faizan Mumtaz
published 3.5
3.37
Freddy Feliz
published 3.5
3.26
Yong Kim
published
3.26
Douglas Thede
published 3.5
THUC NGUYEN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.73
Andrew Tsai
published 3
2.73
James Rentsch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jorge Prieto Choy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edward Xin
95W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Ryan Rohn
242W–218L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Rishi Malhotra
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Chris Bokel
83W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Faizan Mumtaz
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Freddy Feliz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Yong Kim
5W–19L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
3.26
3.5
Douglas Thede
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
THUC NGUYEN
45W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Andrew Tsai
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
James Rentsch
67W–98L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Jorge Prieto Choy
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.