Teams

VCC GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs CCV BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesAimee Madison / Erika Rippee vs Charmaine Jiner / Amber Salwisz6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJessica Lerchbacher vs Anjanette Steadman1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Pretty / Lindsey Bye vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Etheridge / Rachel Candler vs Lisa Heien / Nicole Kleinsteuber6-3, 7-5
2026-07-06vs SS-LT BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesStephanie Geller / Jessica Lerchbacher vs Lindsay Harrell / Chris Patterson5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesKristin Pretty vs Christine Gish5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLindsey Bye / Erika Rippee vs Jennifer Renard / Stevie Vencil1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Etheridge / Aimee Madison vs Katherine Barnes / Anastasia Glennie3-6, 1-6
2026-06-29vs CR-B GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesStephanie Geller / Lindsey Bye vs Annette Knoll / Christine Strang3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKristin Pretty vs Samantha Matthews3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Candler / Aimee Madison vs Lisa Ruffing / Judi Puccini6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Etheridge / Judith Pearson vs Laurie Johnson / Deborah Myers6-4, 6-3
2026-06-22vs PCC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesKristin Pretty / Erika Rippee vs Carol Caflisch / Amy Cook3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKathy Etheridge vs Kelly Gavlak3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Lerchbacher / Stephanie Geller vs Renee Dyer / Erica Haycock6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Kauffman / Stacy Johnson vs Adrienne Cramer / Kimberly Schmidt5-7, 2-6
2026-06-15vs CCV PURPLEWon 40
W#1 DoublesErika Rippee / Jessica Lerchbacher vs Buffy Ransom / Liz Shepard7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAimee Madison vs Jean Duggan6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStacy Johnson / Stephanie Geller vs Georgene Pedrie / Kelli Nesbitt6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJudith Pearson / Rachel Candler vs Beth Hoffman / Susie Ellis6-0, 6-1
2026-06-08vs PRKR GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAimee Madison / Kristin Pretty vs Jessica Johnston / Whitney Coakley5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesErika Rippee vs Michelle Brudigan1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Lerchbacher / Stacy Johnson vs Karen Bielenberg / Laurie Lehmann6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJudith Pearson / Kathy Etheridge vs Lorri Basile / Sarah Schmitz3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-01vs RRTC NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLindsey Bye / Stephanie Geller vs Annie Bennett / Raney Kilgore3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKristin Pretty vs Kristen Wolf6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStacy Johnson / Kathy Etheridge vs Jennifer Lord / Yan Deng6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJudith Pearson / Rachel Candler vs Cheryl Georg / Maria Orton0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Aimee Madison
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.80
Jessica Lerchbacher
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.78
Stephanie Geller
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.78
Kristin Pretty
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Erika Rippee
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.68
Judith Pearson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Lindsey Bye
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Stacy Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.55
Kathy Etheridge
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.48
Lauren Kauffman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Rachel Candler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Geller + Jessica Lerchbacher8554% games+7.6% vs expected
Stacy Johnson + Stephanie Geller3258% games+4.7% vs expected
Kristin Pretty + Erika Rippee13460% games+3.5% vs expected
Aimee Madison + Lauren Kauffman9849% games+2.2% vs expected
Lindsey Bye + Stacy Johnson2346% gamesnot enough data
Judith Pearson + Kathy Etheridge224 matchesnot enough data
Lindsey Bye + Stephanie Geller044 matchesnot enough data
Lindsey Bye + Lauren Kauffman314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Aimee Madison
52W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Jessica Lerchbacher
29W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Stephanie Geller
12W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Kristin Pretty
54W–37L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.78
3
Erika Rippee
78W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
Judith Pearson
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Lindsey Bye
29W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.65
Stacy Johnson
16W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
2.60
3
Kathy Etheridge
15W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
3
Lauren Kauffman
40W–38L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Rachel Candler
12W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.