Teams

Labbe/18/3.5/WD/BREC

2025 BR Adult 18 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 BR (18&O) Women Day

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-04-02vs SELLERS/18/3.5/WD/CCLLost 23
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Wortmann / Darilyn Baudoin vs Tricia Bruno / Leslie Houser3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCindy Pixley vs Alletia Sellers6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrenda Katzmarzyk / Sheila Gordon vs Joanne Harvey / Christy Mendoza4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaula Davis / Corinne Viso vs Ellen Pino / Cherie Favaro3-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesShelly Labbe / Terre Smith vs Cheryl Moreaux / Sophie Moreaux2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 BR (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cindy Pixley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Sheila Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Brenda Katzmarzyk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Suzanne Wortmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Corinne Viso
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Kyle Barker
published
3.04
Darilyn Baudoin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Shelly Labbe
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Carole Wilkins
published 3
2.84
Melanie McCall
published
2.80
Amy Slate
published 3
2.77
Terre Smith
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Donna Mitchell
published
2.60
Kelly Bauder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelly Labbe + Amy Slate4164% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Wortmann + Darilyn Baudoin134 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Katzmarzyk + Sheila Gordon224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Pixley
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sheila Gordon
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Brenda Katzmarzyk
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Suzanne Wortmann
23W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Corinne Viso
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Kyle Barker
7W–25L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Darilyn Baudoin
6W–5L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.04
Shelly Labbe
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Carole Wilkins
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Melanie McCall
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Amy Slate
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Terre Smith
23W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Donna Mitchell
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Kelly Bauder
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.