Teams

Tampa Palms Shot Callers - S. Jang

2025 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesSiwon Jang / Kimberly Smith vs Anderson Sasso / Lindsey Bradbury4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAlyson Thomas vs Jody Jotham6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHyo Han / Karan Orbegoso vs Caro Massari / Lauren Companioni5-7, 2-6
2024-10-04vs Avila Aces 2.5 - I. PetersonWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlyson Thomas / Cindy Sparks vs Tara O'Grady / Gail Wilson6-1, 6-3
2024-10-01vs Hills/Lannon/18&Over2.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesSiwon Jang / Alyson Thomas vs Maggie Packer / Katy Lannon1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKathleen Daciek vs Sara Edge5-7, 0-6
2024-09-20vs Cheval Power - Goodart/WarrenWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Smith / Sonia Cecilia Slaven vs Heather Warren / Pam Frost5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCamille Austin vs Allyson Goodart1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesHyo Han / Kathleen Daciek vs Dhara Patel / Diana Castellanos6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCindy Sparks / Karan Orbegoso vs Oumaima Kaab / Liza Geist6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Alyson Thomas
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.61
Karan Orbegoso
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Sonia Cecilia Slaven
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Kathleen Daciek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Camille Austin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.23
Cindy Sparks
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.21
Siwon Jang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sonia Cecilia Slaven + Karan Orbegoso4354% games+4.5% vs expected
Siwon Jang + Sonia Cecilia Slaven3547% games−4.8% vs expected
Alyson Thomas + Karan Orbegoso4161% gamesnot enough data
Siwon Jang + Alyson Thomas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alyson Thomas
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
2.66
Karan Orbegoso
19W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
0%20%80%
2.61
Sonia Cecilia Slaven
15W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
0%34%66%
2.56
Kathleen Daciek
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%43%57%
2.52
2.5
Camille Austin
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Cindy Sparks
48W–86L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
Siwon Jang
16W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.