← Teams

THPRD-Christensen/Truong

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.31 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Steven Keo
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Gerry Nuthmann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Kirk Planck
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Richard Gronostajski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Russell Homewood
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.94
Wes Milligan
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.93
Dale Christensen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
—
Doug Christensen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results7 ties
2022-11-27Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRichard Gronostajski / James Lawrence vs Michael Adler / Ed Schwartz6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKirk Planck / Doug Christensen vs Jim Gerber / Andrew Kohlmetz7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDale Christensen / Gerry Nuthmann vs Jeff Streich / Mark Rothert5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-11-16Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSteven Keo / Wes Milligan vs Mister Archedon / David Shook6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobert Truong / Gerry Nuthmann vs Brad Shafer / Lee Wiegand6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJames Lawrence / Dale Christensen vs Hisayoshi Watanabe / Andrew Geisler7-5, 6-3
2022-10-21Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRussell Homewood / Robert Truong vs James Takahashi / Page Watts6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRichard Gronostajski / James Lawrence vs Jay Mark / Chuck Yett6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDoug Christensen / Steven Keo vs Murray Jansen / Than LE6-2, 6-0
2022-10-09Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesRobert Truong / Russell Homewood vs Zachary Wright / Jim Lekas6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDale Christensen / James Lawrence vs Tim Leatherman / Dirk Jacobs6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRichard Gronostajski / Gerry Nuthmann vs John Magaddino / Marc Alexander6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-09-30Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSteven Keo / Wes Milligan vs Peter Kosky / RICK ROGOWAY1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDale Christensen / Gerry Nuthmann vs David Lee / John Walsh6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKirk Planck / Doug Christensen vs Gary McKenzie / Shirish Patel6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-11Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRobert Truong / Russell Homewood vs Robert Broad / Jim DeWeese6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSteven Keo / Wes Milligan vs Richard Anderson / Eric Halvorson1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKirk Planck / Doug Christensen vs George Husbands / Carl McConnell6-2, 6-3
2022-09-09Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesKirk Planck / Wes Milligan vs Nick Majmudar / Arjun Bilakanti7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRussell Homewood / Richard Gronostajski vs Paul Harwood / Craig Walker6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDale Christensen / James Lawrence vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Steven Keo
45W–44L career
0%97%3%
3.35
3.5
Gerry Nuthmann
27W–37L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Kirk Planck
91W–71L career
6%94%0%
3.15
3.5
Richard Gronostajski
90W–91L career
6%94%0%
3.15
3
Russell Homewood
12W–18L career · type A
0%46%54%
3.13
3.5
Wes Milligan
128W–77L career
51%49%0%
2.94
3
Dale Christensen
61W–64L career
0%87%13%
2.93
3
Doug Christensen
17W–18L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.