Teams

LWGO-Goodwin/6.5 Thurs 55

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 55 & Over · W 6.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-22vs LCMathis/WestportWon 10
W#3 DoublesNorma Zitnik / Katherine Karnatz vs Kathleen Weisman / Laura Gallapis6-0, 6-0
2022-09-15vs LAMcAfee/Griffin/PeninsulaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnnette Mootilal / Katherine Karnatz vs Patti Griffin / Sheila Wakeman6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesWendy Goodwin / Norma Zitnik vs Amy Light / Jacqueline Hare3-6, 3-6
2022-09-08vs LKKaake/Holbrook 6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCindy Japec / Katherine Karnatz vs Lori Anne Emlong / Shelly Brock2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNorma Zitnik / Tammy Fisher vs Lisa Levy / Jennifer Ashford6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-09-01vs LRADavis/RRCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnnette Mootilal / Katherine Karnatz vs Lisa Squatriglia / Natalie Van Epps6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNorma Zitnik / Wendy Goodwin vs Bonita Beeken / Debbie Noe6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-18vs LCLong/PeninsulaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCindy Japec / Kathy Murphy vs Suzun McCrary / Susan King3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnnette Mootilal / Katherine Karnatz vs Mindy Francis / Valerie Smithers6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Cindy Japec
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Cindy Mexcur
published 3.5
3.17
Norma Zitnik
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Katherine Karnatz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.03
Anette Solmaz
published 3.5
3.02
Kathy Murphy
published
2.99
Tammy Fisher
published
2.80
Arlene Ireland
published 3
2.55
Wendy Goodwin
published
Teri Deuel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Japec + Norma Zitnik4160% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Mexcur + Norma Zitnik314 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Mexcur + Wendy Goodwin134 matchesnot enough data
Arlene Ireland + Kathy Murphy134 matchesnot enough data
Norma Zitnik + Arlene Ireland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Japec
242W–219L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Cindy Mexcur
161W–157L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Norma Zitnik
132W–136L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Katherine Karnatz
190W–172L career · 5 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Anette Solmaz
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
Kathy Murphy
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.02
Tammy Fisher
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Arlene Ireland
116W–115L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Wendy Goodwin
12W–26L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
Teri Deuel
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.