Teams

CORTA/Neil Desai

2025 CORTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring · Men 3.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.43 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-13vs Walburg/Wolf-CCLost 23
W#1 DoublesNeil Desai / Sun Kim vs L Scott Laymon / Steve Walburg6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJohn Pezold vs Mike Chancey2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnderson Philips / Al Dean vs Walter Henry / Stephen Magner2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGerald Saunders / Mark Lawrence vs Derick Wolf / Adam Centerbar5-7, 4-6
W#4 DoublesKetan Dalsania / Rantz Walters vs Gerald Madler / John Morris6-4, 7-5
2025-03-27vs Walburg/Wolf-CCLost 05
L#1 DoublesDavid Barrett / John Pezold vs L Scott Laymon / Adam Centerbar7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRich Pak vs Mike Chancey3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesForrest Champion / Tim Caraveo vs Doug Gibson / Gerald Madler3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRantz Walters / Michael Lynch vs Derick Wolf / Paul Graham1-6, 6-7
L#4 DoublesAl Dean / Alfred Blackmar vs John Morris / David Morris6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-13vs Walburg/Wolf-CCWon 41
W#1 DoublesRich Pak / Bruce McKenzie vs Richard Reid / L Scott Laymon6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTan Pham vs Mike Chancey2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNeil Desai / David Barrett vs Derick Wolf / David Morris6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Mann / Zach Farmer vs Gerald Madler / John Morris6-2, 6-3
W#4 DoublesRantz Walters / Al Dean vs Doug Gibson / Steve Walburg6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Samuel Park
published
3.67
David Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Neil Desai
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Rantz Walters
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Zach Farmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Eddie Cawthorne
published
3.27
Ketan Dalsania
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Al Dean
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Bruce McKenzie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Alap Shah
published 3.5
3.18
John Pezold
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Rich Pak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.14
Suresh Nukala
published
3.12
Alfred Blackmar
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Anderson Philips
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Kevin McPherson
published
3.07
Gerald Saunders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Tan Pham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.02
Tim Villegas
published
2.93
Forrest Champion
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Thomas Harrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Cameron Kersey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Tim Caraveo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ketan Dalsania + Bruce McKenzie404 matchesnot enough data
Anderson Philips + Al Dean123 matchesnot enough data
Tim Caraveo + Thomas Harrell123 matchesnot enough data
Tim Villegas + Rantz Walters303 matchesnot enough data
David Barrett + Kevin McPherson213 matchesnot enough data
Rantz Walters + Al Dean303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samuel Park
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.74
3.5
David Barrett
30W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.67
Neil Desai
71W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Rantz Walters
45W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Zach Farmer
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Eddie Cawthorne
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Ketan Dalsania
25W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Al Dean
16W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Bruce McKenzie
28W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Alap Shah
33W–32L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
John Pezold
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Rich Pak
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Suresh Nukala
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Alfred Blackmar
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Anderson Philips
6W–17L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Kevin McPherson
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Gerald Saunders
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Tan Pham
18W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.02
Tim Villegas
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Forrest Champion
33W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Thomas Harrell
11W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Cameron Kersey
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Tim Caraveo
1W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.