Teams

ELW Christison

2023 Pinellas Mixed 40 & Over Winter · 8.0 MXD

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-13vs RCSP RippersWon 10
W#1 DoublesDane Houston / Cari Reagin vs Alan Chin / Xi Mannari6-1, 6-4
2023-02-19vs Seminole Lake TimminsLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Ironsmith / Michele Ironsmith vs Brian Hodapp / JoAnn Lind4-6, 2-6
2023-02-16vs Pinellas/Martinez/40&Over8.0XLost 01
L#1 DoublesDane Houston / Kirsten Willis vs Zobeida Canfield / Chris Canfield2-6, 4-6
2023-02-05vs McMullen FramersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJames Bettencourt / Michele Ironsmith vs Rob Tenney / Yve Feinberg6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesWendy Unger / Dane Houston vs Lisa Oonk / Sven Folmer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-01-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesKirsten Willis / Dane Houston vs Xi Mannari / Sean Fisher6-3, 6-2
2023-01-22vs ELW OrrLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Robert Ironsmith vs Teresa Orr / Naveen Kumria4-6, 5-7
2023-01-13vs Safety Harbor PasinskiWon 10
W#3 DoublesKirsten Willis / Dane Houston vs Christopher Hollingsworth / Amy Brooks6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MXD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Michele Ironsmith
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.85
Kirsten Willis
published
3.59
Dane Houston
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.40
James Bettencourt
published
3.38
Patrick LaLone
published
3.17
Amy Burns
published 3.5
Jillene Davis
published
Kevin Behan
published
Rena Khawam
published
Robert Ironsmith
published
Wendy Unger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Ironsmith + Michele Ironsmith2349% gamesnot enough data
Kirsten Willis + Dane Houston134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michele Ironsmith
158W–102L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.50
Kirsten Willis
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Dane Houston
155W–186L career · 5 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
James Bettencourt
14W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
Patrick LaLone
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Amy Burns
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Jillene Davis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kevin Behan
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rena Khawam
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Ironsmith
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wendy Unger
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.