Teams

LShelton (BCC)

2025 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-22vs KSmith (Piper Glen)Won 30
W#1 DoublesNatalie Corrigan / Kristina Nichols vs Ursula Bonar / Tama van Wie7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMargit Etzel / Rebecca Maietta vs Lynn Freitas / Carrie Letorney6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAndrea Sappenfield / Melissa Davis vs Kalyn Smith / Wanda Mallette6-1, 6-1
2025-09-01vs TEby (OPRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKristen Palmer / Michelle Silla vs Amy Snead / Caroleen Towery2-6, 1-6
2025-08-25vs ASpanjers (Park Road)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Rosenburgh / Michelle Silla vs Kelly Mosby / Allison York0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrea Sappenfield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
Kristen Palmer
published
2.52
Margit Etzel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Natalie Corrigan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Rebecca Maietta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Ellen McKane
published
2.46
Michelle Silla
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.34
Linda Shelton
published
2.32
Lisa Short
published
2.18
Payal K
published
Kim Rosenburgh
published
Kristina Nichols
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andrea Sappenfield
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Palmer
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Margit Etzel
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Natalie Corrigan
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.49
Rebecca Maietta
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Ellen McKane
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
3
Michelle Silla
39W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.46
Linda Shelton
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.34
Lisa Short
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.32
Payal K
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Kim Rosenburgh
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristina Nichols
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.