Teams

LAMichalskiLNTC

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 55 & Over · W 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-10vs LKWI-Williams/SCWon 10
W#1 DoublesSHARON WELLS / Amy Michalski vs Karla Williams / Anne Clark6-1, 6-1
2022-09-26vs LBKU-Kumar/PACLost 01
L#1 DoublesFilomena Ferri / Amy Michalski vs Lois Forti / Susan Clayton6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-09-19vs LKWI-Williams/SCWon 10
W#1 DoublesSHARON WELLS / Debbie Scott vs Karla Williams / Amelia Johnson6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-09-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Michalski / Filomena Ferri vs Kathy Henry / Jennifer Jenkins6-1, 6-3
2022-08-19vs LBKU-Kumar/PACWon 10
W#1 DoublesSHARON WELLS / Amy Michalski vs Kathy Henry / Becky Kumar7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
SHARON WELLS
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Filomena Ferri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Tracey McKenna
published
Carole Catlett
published 3.5
3.14
Kathleen Cassino
published
3.07
Karen Walters
published
3.05
Kathryn Marazzi
published
3.03
Sylvia Holley
published
3.00
Amy Michalski
published 3.5
2.97
Victoria Taylor
published
2.96
Lorelei Hewitt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Filomena Ferri + SHARON WELLS6163% gamesnot enough data
Filomena Ferri + Tracey McKenna303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
SHARON WELLS
119W–50L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Filomena Ferri
136W–125L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.60
Tracey McKenna
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Carole Catlett
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Cassino
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Karen Walters
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Kathryn Marazzi
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
Sylvia Holley
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Amy Michalski
2W–15L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
Victoria Taylor
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
Lorelei Hewitt
0W–11L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.