Teams

Marco YMCA / Washak

2025 Collier Adult 18 & Over Spring · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-28vs Riverstone / MalletteLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarzenna Nowak / Bernadette DiPino vs Bailey Lardinois / Terry Dirr1-6, 3-6
2025-05-19vs heritage Bay - DelkWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarzenna Nowak / Rachel Schenk vs Alejandra Acuna / Kristen Catino6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Garvey / Sindi Sanzica vs Gretchen Landolt / Rachael Klaas6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDana Sacks / Donna Digeronimo vs Mia Delk / Cynthia Heidkamp6-3, 6-0
2025-05-05vs COLLIER/Gardner/Adult18&over4.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesDonna Digeronimo / Dana Sacks vs Sara Munholland / Wendy Garber6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-04-28vs heritage Bay - DelkLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Degasperi / Andrea Washak vs Karen Hole / Nancy Krueger2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-21vs Riverstone / MalletteWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarzenna Nowak / Bernadette DiPino vs Megan MacKrory / Heather Christie6-1, 6-1
2025-04-14vs COLLIER/Gardner/Adult18&over4.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarzenna Nowak / Rachel Schenk vs Elizabeth Hayes / Katie Lober6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Solimine / Andrea Washak vs Tammy Finlinson / Amy Gardner4-6, 0-6
2025-04-07vs heritage Bay - DelkWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarzenna Nowak / Rachel Schenk vs Gretchen Landolt / Alexandra Fast6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelissa Degasperi / Sindi Sanzica vs Lisa Vivori / Marie France McCloskey6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDana Sacks / Donna Digeronimo vs Kimberly Davey / Rachael Klaas6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-31vs Riverstone / MalletteLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarzenna Nowak / Rachel Schenk vs Terry Dirr / Megan MacKrory5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Cologero / Sindi Sanzica vs Amanda Mallette / Kelly Stein4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDana Sacks / Maria Hayden vs Jennifer Brown / Nikki Miller6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-24vs COLLIER/Gardner/Adult18&over4.0WLost 02
L#2 DoublesTonja Brewer / Ann Garvey vs Catherine Rigamer / Beth Jones4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Digeronimo / Dana Sacks vs Melissa Bailey / Jocie Jandovitz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Marzenna Nowak
published
3.95
Tonja Brewer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Bernadette DiPino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Cheryl Solimine
published 4
3.79
Ann Garvey
published 4
3.77
Lynne Huggins
published
3.76
Rachel Schenk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Melissa Degasperi
published
3.74
Julie Cologero
published
3.70
Andrea Washak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Donna Digeronimo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Dana Sacks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Maria Hayden
published
3.50
Tricia McBride
published
3.49
Inge Lund
published
3.48
Sindi Sanzica
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bernadette DiPino + Marzenna Nowak14462% games+4.9% vs expected
Marzenna Nowak + Cheryl Solimine5261% games+4.0% vs expected
Bernadette DiPino + Andrea Washak471162% games+3.7% vs expected
Donna Digeronimo + Dana Sacks8554% games+1.1% vs expected
Rachel Schenk + Bernadette DiPino11464% games−9.4% vs expected
Rachel Schenk + Andrea Washak4749% gamesnot enough data
Bernadette DiPino + Sindi Sanzica5256% gamesnot enough data
Tricia McBride + Lynne Huggins3349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marzenna Nowak
46W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Tonja Brewer
90W–62L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Bernadette DiPino
318W–110L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Cheryl Solimine
36W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Ann Garvey
73W–48L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Lynne Huggins
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Rachel Schenk
139W–70L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
Melissa Degasperi
27W–29L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Julie Cologero
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Andrea Washak
352W–306L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Donna Digeronimo
107W–91L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.62
4
Dana Sacks
218W–149L career · 5 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Maria Hayden
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Tricia McBride
12W–26L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Inge Lund
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Sindi Sanzica
104W–135L career · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Lisa LaSpina Bonevento
13W–36L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.