Teams

Tita's Too

2022 Adult 40 and Over League · 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.79 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-13vs Tita ConnectionSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDeborah Hashimoto-Skorikov / Liane Martin vs Donna Shibuya / Karyn Tada6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCynthia Keliihoomalu vs Allegra Petras3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJudith Jennet / Nina Segawa vs Rebecca Daniel / Nora Usita6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNoriko Kobayashi / Rhonda Zavarro vs Nami Mizutani / Lori Nekoba5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2022-03-06vs Lava GirlsWon 31
W#1 DoublesTeresa Doak / Nora Usita vs Lynette Aki / Nami Mizutani0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJENNY NISHIDA vs Reiko Bando1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLori Nekoba / Nina Segawa vs Jennifer Kagiwada / Rhonda Zavarro6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFrances Calantoc / Rebecca Daniel vs Esther Hughes / Sheri Kinoshita6-4, 6-3
2022-02-27vs Tita ConnectionLost 04
L#1 DoublesNikki Ideta / Nina Segawa vs Rebecca Daniel / Teresa Doak6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLori Kamimura vs Reiko Bando1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kagiwada / Liane Martin vs Lynette Aki / Lori Nekoba2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDeborah Hashimoto-Skorikov / Rhonda Zavarro vs Esther Hughes / Karyn Tada2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-02-20vs Tita ConnectionLost 04
L#1 DoublesLori Kamimura / Liane Martin vs Nikki Ideta / Allegra Petras4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCynthia Keliihoomalu vs Judith Jennet0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Daniel / Rhonda Zavarro vs Sheri Kinoshita / Donna Shibuya6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Kagiwada / Nora Usita vs Michelle Smith / Karyn Tada2-6, 2-6
2022-02-13vs Tita ConnectionSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNina Segawa / Michelle Smith vs Noriko Kobayashi / Liane Martin6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesCynthia Keliihoomalu vs Allegra Petras4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa Doak / JENNY NISHIDA vs Lynette Aki / Donna Shibuya6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesFrances Calantoc / Deborah Hashimoto-Skorikov vs Reiko Bando / Lori Nekoba1-6, 3-6
2022-02-06vs Tita ConnectionSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kagiwada / JENNY NISHIDA vs Reiko Bando / Nikki Ideta7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLori Kamimura vs Judith Jennet6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTeresa Doak / Noriko Kobayashi vs Esther Hughes / Karyn Tada6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFrances Calantoc / Deborah Hashimoto-Skorikov vs Lynette Aki / Sheri Kinoshita3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tita's Too0671738256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
JENNY NISHIDA
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Nina Segawa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Teresa Doak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Deborah Hashimoto-Skorikov
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Liane Martin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.29
Lori Kamimura
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Frances Calantoc
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.78
Cynthia Keliihoomalu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Jennifer Kagiwada
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nora Usita
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Noriko Kobayashi
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rebecca Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Rhonda Zavarro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Zavarro + Teresa Doak5254% games+0.2% vs expected
Nina Segawa + Teresa Doak3257% gamesnot enough data
Liane Martin + Teresa Doak3258% gamesnot enough data
Rhonda Zavarro + Rebecca Daniel044 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Zavarro + Deborah Hashimoto-Skorikov123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
JENNY NISHIDA
29W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Nina Segawa
89W–37L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Teresa Doak
66W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Deborah Hashimoto-Skorikov
37W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Liane Martin
102W–109L career · 4 lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
3.57
Lori Kamimura
30W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
3.29
3.5
Frances Calantoc
57W–80L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Cynthia Keliihoomalu
35W–42L career · type S · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
Jennifer Kagiwada
7W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nora Usita
12W–22L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Noriko Kobayashi
24W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Daniel
18W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rhonda Zavarro
19W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.