← Teams

SHC-Jackson/Williams

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.21 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Jeffrey Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.19
Brian Dehen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Honorato Wenceslao
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.82
Jeroen Swanborn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.79
Patrick Trank
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
—
Brian Theobald
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.68
Matthew Trank
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
—
Ronald Jackson
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 0
Results8 ties
2020-03-08Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesRusty Williams / Jeffrey Hunt vs James Fenner / Brian Sinclair1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHonorato Wenceslao / Ronald Jackson vs Ry Koteen / Soren Coughlin-Glaser3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBrian Theobald vs Max Breslau6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrian Dehen / Jeroen Swanborn vs Brian Hendrickson / Alex Simpson1-6, 6-0, 1-0
2020-03-01Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesRusty Williams / Jeffrey Hunt vs Ricky Huynh / Charles Tran4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHonorato Wenceslao vs Mariano Pastor6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRonald Jackson / Brian Dehen vs Matthew Levering / Ryan Chin6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMike Reiss / Patrick Trank vs Matt Chesley / Charles Taguet5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2020-02-22Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesRusty Williams / Jeffrey Hunt vs Franklin Truong / Sage Katayama7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesRonald Jackson vs John Block6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatthew Trank / Patrick Trank vs Joshua Owens / Anh Ngo6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesHonorato Wenceslao vs Shane Wilson6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2020-01-25Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesBrian Dehen / Evan Zupancic vs John Ezelle / Todd Klindt6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesRonald Jackson vs Adrien Leemin6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMatthew Trank / Patrick Trank vs Justin Greene / Chris Rivera6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJohn McCroskey / Jeroen Swanborn vs Jeremy Morris / David Tinsley6-4, 6-3
2020-01-18Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesRusty Williams / Jeffrey Hunt vs Anthony Nelson / Jeff Berman6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn McCroskey / Jeroen Swanborn vs Shung Shin / Steve Bruning6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPatrick Trank / Matthew Trank vs Peter Aleman / BON UNG6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2020-01-12Lost 0–3
L#1 SinglesJeroen Swanborn vs John Block2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRusty Williams / Jeffrey Hunt vs Jimmy Shen / Shane Wilson7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesRonald Jackson / John McCroskey vs Bao Bui / Issei Saida6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2019-12-15Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesBrian Dehen / Amy Murphy vs Jim Wheeler / Rise Hawley6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2019-12-07Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Trank / Patrick Trank vs Tony Solivan / Tom Lonergan6-1, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Jeffrey Hunt
26W–18L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Brian Dehen
29W–44L career
7%87%6%
4.19
4.5
Honorato Wenceslao
128W–74L career
1%99%0%
4.18
4
Jeroen Swanborn
67W–46L career
0%98%2%
3.82
4
Patrick Trank
87W–59L career
1%98%1%
3.79
4
Brian Theobald
13W–15L career
not enough data
—
4
Matthew Trank
78W–63L career
3%97%0%
3.68
0
Ronald Jackson
8W–27L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.