Teams

2.LOCH.Riley

2022 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-21vs 9.TOC.MerckLost 01
L#2 SinglesJeff Cockayne vs Craig Brehmer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-19vs 8.MVL.JayashankaranSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEverett Laborde / Ben Freeman vs DEEPAK GAONKAR / Sameer Cheema6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJeff Cockayne vs Chris Henderson2-6, 5-7
2022-05-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesEverett Laborde / Ben Freeman vs Ramesh Veerappan / Ananth Shankar6-1, 6-1
2022-04-30vs 10.TOC.SankarSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEverett Laborde / Ben Freeman vs Rahul Narang / Praveen Krishnamurthy6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJeff Cockayne vs Harsh Ashani4-6, 4-6
2022-03-26vs 3.MVL.ByrdLost 01
L#1 DoublesEverett Laborde / Scott Riley vs Cesar Ramos / Andrew Perdue3-6, 3-6
2022-03-19vs 6.TOC.MorrowLost 01
L#1 SinglesJeff Cockayne vs Alex Renfrow0-6, 0-6
2022-03-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEverett Laborde / Jeff Estroff vs Jeffrey Romeo / Sean Romeo7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-02-26vs 4.PW.PerezSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEverett Laborde / Scott Anderson vs Edwal Stone / Rene Dittrich7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJeff Cockayne vs Craig Collard0-6, 2-6
2022-02-19Won 10
W#1 SinglesJeff Cockayne vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Jeff Cockayne
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.79
Mark Baldwin
published
3.77
Everett Laborde
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.69
Scott Riley
published
3.59
Jeff Estroff
published
3.48
Pedro Torrejon
published
3.29
Brian Heaphy
published 3.5
3.28
Joseph Holsopple
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Everett Laborde + Jeff Cockayne5362% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeff Cockayne
156W–61L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
4.03
Mark Baldwin
18W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Everett Laborde
89W–62L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Scott Riley
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Jeff Estroff
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.59
Pedro Torrejon
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Brian Heaphy
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Joseph Holsopple
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.