Teams

Seminole Lake Jordan

2024 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.0 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.14 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-16vs Countryside WeibleWon 10
W#2 DoublesPatty Anderson / Moise Carrington vs Tammy Miller / Kathleen Lucey4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-02vs Innisbrook SmithWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Jordan / Moise Carrington vs Dawn Colonna / Bethany Bushea6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-02-24vs Ardea (ELW) HueholtWon 10
W#2 DoublesDebi Billington / Moise Carrington vs Debra Burwell / Kimberly Ankney6-0, 6-3
2024-02-10vs Bardmoor PetersWon 10
W#2 DoublesDebi Billington / Debra Edwards vs Christine Barrett / Vanvisa Cheung6-1, 6-0
2024-01-20vs Pinellas/Faraci/18&Over3.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesAsheley Wardell / Debi Billington vs Susan Barham / Dana Schoenbeck6-0, 6-1
2024-01-13vs Tarpon SpiesWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Jordan / Moise Carrington vs Mary Frances Warford / Mary Garrido6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Brandy Fernandez
published 3.5
3.23
Moise Carrington
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.99
Valeska Dykes
published
2.94
Michele Girardi
published
2.92
Erica Allums
published 3
2.91
Debi Billington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Karen Morris
published
2.82
Debra Edwards
published 3
2.81
Asheley Wardell
published 3
2.66
Beverly Bozarth
published 3
2.62
Patty Anderson
published
2.48
Sonia Agee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valeska Dykes + Michele Girardi13266% games+8.7% vs expected
Debi Billington + Beverly Bozarth123 matchesnot enough data
Debi Billington + Debra Edwards213 matchesnot enough data
Beverly Bozarth + Debra Edwards123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brandy Fernandez
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Moise Carrington
67W–72L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Valeska Dykes
20W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
Michele Girardi
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Erica Allums
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Debi Billington
24W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
Karen Morris
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Debra Edwards
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Asheley Wardell
9W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Beverly Bozarth
33W–17L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
2.66
Patty Anderson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
Sonia Agee
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.