Teams

Racq Pacq

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY · Ladies 2.5

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-14vs Sweet ShotsWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Scott / Brianna Thrash vs Catherine Torres / Alison Ducker6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLaura Sykes vs Monique Zint0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTraci Holm / Megan Zaal vs Javiera Pierattini / Thomasina Williams6-1, 6-2
2026-06-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesLyndsey Beckman / Maria Pantaleoni vs Kari Obrien / Courtney Wright6-1, 6-2
2026-05-29vs ATX AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrianna Thrash / Laura Sykes vs Nedra Gartica / Carolee Justus5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJayne Saucedo / Traci Holm vs Rachel Pry / Kathy Panton0-6, 1-6
2026-05-15vs Terminetters 2.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCarrie Morton / Kerri Westmoreland vs Amanda Atkinson / Catherine Troyer6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBrianna Thrash vs Stefanie Bertram1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJayne Saucedo / Maria Pantaleoni vs Leena Mistry / Jennifer Wren3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-05-08vs Backhanded ComplimentsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKerri Westmoreland / Megan Zaal vs Martha Coerver / Eileen Steinberger6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLyndsey Beckman / Maria Pantaleoni vs Karen Cohen / Heilla Lain4-6, 6-7
2026-04-24Split 11
W#1 SinglesLaura Sykes vs Alison Biers6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Scott / Traci Holm vs Christine Anderson / Korie Knapp Masterson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-17vs Doubles TherapyWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrianna Thrash / Kerri Westmoreland vs Katie Shoen / Kelly Jo Specter6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Zaal / Laura Sykes vs Katherine Gallagher / Amy Woodell6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · Ladies 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sweet Shots4210817134
2Net Ninjas4210819161
3Terminetters 2.53311718152
4Racq Pacq3371125164
5Doubles Therapy2481022168
6Bagel Girls2481024163
7Backhanded Compliments000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.16 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.37
Kerri Westmoreland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Maria Pantaleoni
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Brianna Thrash
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.09
Laura Sykes
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
1.93
Traci Holm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerri Westmoreland + Brianna Thrash213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kerri Westmoreland
24W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.37
Maria Pantaleoni
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Brianna Thrash
23W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Laura Sykes
16W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Traci Holm
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.