Teams

LHumphries/Miller (Raintree)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 9 6:30 PM
vs
Raintree Country Club
Sep 16 6:30 PM
Queens Sports Complex at Marion Diehl Park
Sep 23 6:30 PM
vs
Raintree Country Club
Sep 30 7:00 PM
vs
Bridge Hampton Clubhouse
2026-09-02vs LHuntington (Park Road)Won 21
L#1 DoublesJulie Klingman / Caroline Cox vs Julie Moore / Marilyn Spencer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Lober / Margaret Miller vs Lisa Huntington / Gray Setaro6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristian Bohnstedt / Lauren Humphries vs Punky Brick / Joanne Lee3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-12vs BBaker (Queens)Won 21
L#1 DoublesJulie Ackerlund / Linda Lober vs Allison Purmort / Katherine Koppel-Dobbs1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCaroline Cox / Alexis Schwartz vs Spencer Stoakley / Anna Sison6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristian Bohnstedt / Krista Gibson vs Brittany Baker / Kathy Kopec6-3, 6-2
2026-08-05vs SChandra (Charlotte Tennis)Won 21
W#1 DoublesCaroline Cox / Suzanne MacVicar vs Megan Biller / Melodie Ohaus6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLauren Humphries / Margaret Miller vs Lauren Olson / Jeannine Mortenson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAndrea Caldini / Kelly Wolff vs Micahla Funderburk / Sarah Varner0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings35 teams · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MMohammed/SAliota (Carmel)3090149
2MWalters (Carmel)3081453
3MWolf/JShelley (WSRC)3072559
4VShannon (Raintree)3081558
5RJoplin (Queens)3063770
6JWaleski (OPRC)2051227
7AMcGarry/AIngalls (CSRC)2051345
8LHumphries/Miller (Raintree)2042446
9TRicks (Queens)2042552
10LQuattlebaum/Mullins (OPRC)2172667
11MMetzl (Sardis)2163761
12JRuggiero/LMonty (Palisades)21541086
13AChristie/ASmith (PPRSC)21541074
14MLong/SFarley (Queens)1142548
15AEagan/SSamuelson (WRSC)1142657
16HLee/SRock (Piper Glen)1133655
17RVora/SMoon (Lifetime)1133752
18DCazorla (BCC)1254980
19SLind (Bridgehampton)1254968
20ELeMaitre (Park Road)12541083
21SJPragasam/KLoor (Jeff Adams)12541084
22MAllen/SStork (Sardis)12451195
23SChandra (Charlotte Tennis)12361387
24MLGarrison (Sardis)12361394
25CKing (Life Time)12271498
26PSweeney (FCC)122715101
27APessina/LAbhoulson (Queens)0224850
28SHarris/KSmith (Park Road)0224868
29BBaker (Queens)0224855
30CArevalo (Park Road)0224963
31CTharp (Queens)02151061
32JHargis (Pine Lake)02151069
33JMugnano (Queens)02061271
34LCulp (Park Road)03181694
35KWagner (Jeff Adams)030918105

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Caroline Cox
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Linda Lober
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.85
Julie Klingman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Suzanne MacVicar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Andrea Caldini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Chelsea Law
published 3
Christian Bohnstedt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Krista Gibson
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.66
Julie Ackerlund
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Lauren Humphries
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.45
Melissa Orr
published
2.35
Kelly Wolff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Klingman + Andrea Caldini134 matchesnot enough data
Julie Klingman + Suzanne MacVicar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Cox
5W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Linda Lober
65W–82L career · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.02
3
Julie Klingman
39W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Suzanne MacVicar
88W–100L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Andrea Caldini
28W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Chelsea Law
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Christian Bohnstedt
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Krista Gibson
27W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.69
3
Julie Ackerlund
44W–54L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Lauren Humphries
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%25%75%
2.60
Melissa Orr
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45
Kelly Wolff
6W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.