Teams

Bako - BRC Hitters

2024 Adult 18 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 3.5 - Bake

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-09vs LLW - Bako -- Team TorgusenLost 02
L#1 SinglesMinda Owens vs Rhonda Slegers3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKristin Weber / Marri Tillema vs Natalie Chene / Linette Holliday3-6, 2-6
2024-06-02vs Bako - Queen's of the CourtWon 10
W#1 DoublesMisty Haverstock / Minda Owens vs Diane Bashirtash / Crystal Neptune4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-19vs LLW - Bako -- Team TorgusenWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarri Tillema / Lauren Huynh vs Rhonda Slegers / Hyejung Oh0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-12vs Bako - Queen's of the CourtWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaurie Haagsma / Marri Tillema vs Krista Rodriguez / Erika Gatson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-28vs LLW - Bako -- Team TorgusenLost 01
L#1 SinglesMinda Owens vs Rhonda Slegers0-6, 1-6
2024-04-06vs Bako - Queen's of the CourtLost 02
L#1 SinglesMinda Owens vs Rebecca Badgett4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMarri Tillema vs Rosemarie Galindo4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Ashley South
published 4
Ashley Periera
published 3.5
3.16
Lauren Huynh
published
3.13
Agnes DeJong
published 3.5
3.08
Erin Black
published
3.06
Leah Coughlin
published
3.04
Michelle Pisano
published
3.03
Miranda Hwang
published
3.02
Meghan Carnegie
published
2.92
Cheyenne Romanini
published 3.5
2.90
Marri Tillema
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Cindy Seibly
published 3
2.76
Minda Owens
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 3
2.73
Amanda Buoni
published 3
Misty Haverstock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marri Tillema + Minda Owens101253% games+10.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ashley South
14W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
3.5
Ashley Periera
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cheyanne Antongiovanni
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Huynh
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.16
3.5
Agnes DeJong
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
Erin Black
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
Leah Coughlin
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
Michelle Pisano
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
Miranda Hwang
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
Meghan Carnegie
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
3.5
Cheyenne Romanini
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Marri Tillema
49W–64L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Cindy Seibly
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Minda Owens
39W–55L career · 10 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Amanda Buoni
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Misty Haverstock
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.