Teams

ACAC Kelsey / Davis

2022 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-02vs Woodlake CabralLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Kelsey / Jeanette Kim vs Tami Chalker / Laurie Cooksey2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-28vs ACAC BartholomewWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / Yasmin Lutterbie vs Dawn MacHonis / Dawn Toft6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-13vs Westwood Wilcox Whackers - WWWLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / Erika King vs Jessica van Tuyle / Cherie Warfield4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-10-05vs Kings Charter GaliffaWon 10
W#1 DoublesJean Davis / Jeanette Kim vs Donna Mourtzakis / Mary Spagnolo6-4, 6-4
2022-09-28vs Ridgetop PughWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeanette Kim / Dawn Kelsey vs Ann Likhterev / Carin Krawitz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBetsy Civilette / Christina Aeinan Kang vs Margaret Burke / Holly Martin4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Christina Aeinan Kang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Yasmin Lutterbie
published
3.27
Betsy Civilette
published 3.5
Jeanette Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Jean Davis
published
3.16
Dawn Kelsey
published 3.5
3.16
Deanne Ralston
published 3.5
3.15
Irene Quilez
published 3.5
3.11
Erika King
published 3.5
3.06
Jennifer Funk
published
2.82
Mari Litz
published
2.79
Mary Follis
published
2.79
Ariana Dickens
published 3
2.77
Pamela Blackburn
published
2.37
Julia Preusser
published
Toosdhi Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betsy Civilette + Yasmin Lutterbie224 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Civilette + Jean Davis123 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Kelsey + Yasmin Lutterbie213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Aeinan Kang
157W–167L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Yasmin Lutterbie
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Betsy Civilette
12W–17L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Jeanette Kim
203W–155L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jean Davis
24W–23L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Dawn Kelsey
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Deanne Ralston
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Irene Quilez
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Erika King
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Jennifer Funk
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
Mari Litz
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
Mary Follis
28W–25L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Ariana Dickens
14W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
Pamela Blackburn
28W–34L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Julia Preusser
12W–18L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.37
Toosdhi Jackson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.