Teams

LCTA18/Rogers/DannyJones

Combo 18 & Over · Men 5.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-27vs LATA18/MOODY/LCTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesGrady Rogers / Slava Zeif vs David Dickson / Jon Davis6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRob Dauch / Rudy Romano vs Seth Hanna / Christopher Wisnewski2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKevin Chisholm / Charn Pitiranggon vs Sivakumar Shanmugam / DJ Cox7-6, 6-1
2024-10-27vs LATA18/Dye/CTFCWon 21
W#1 DoublesGrady Rogers / Slava Zeif vs Damon Remley / Scott Prince6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKevin Chisholm / Charn Pitiranggon vs John David Scheper / DWIGHT SAWYER6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRob Dauch / Rudy Romano vs Jordan Hicks / Grant Hensley1-6, 1-6
2024-10-26vs LLAS UPTA18C/Woodall/BrookstoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesCharn Pitiranggon / Kevin Chisholm vs Joseph Cope / Chris Burton6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGrady Rogers / Slava Zeif vs Michael Woodall / Shawn Knox6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRudy Romano / Rob Dauch vs Chris Troup / Ryan Camak6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Charn Pitiranggon
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Grady Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.16
Adam Holzer
published 3
3.11
Kevin Chisholm
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Rudy Romano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Cameron Spell
published 3
2.90
Rob Dauch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Brian Corley
published 3
Matthew Amrit
published
Slava Zeif
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Wilbert Suggs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Chisholm + Charn Pitiranggon6162% games+17.9% vs expected
Cameron Spell + Rudy Romano4165% games+14.0% vs expected
Kevin Chisholm + Rob Dauch7259% games+10.7% vs expected
Slava Zeif + Rob Dauch2349% games+10.1% vs expected
Kevin Chisholm + Adam Holzer13461% games+8.3% vs expected
Charn Pitiranggon + Rudy Romano9162% games+7.9% vs expected
Rob Dauch + Rudy Romano4357% gamesnot enough data
Slava Zeif + Grady Rogers404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charn Pitiranggon
43W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Grady Rogers
66W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.23
3
Adam Holzer
36W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.16
Kevin Chisholm
48W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.11
Rudy Romano
46W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Cameron Spell
23W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.90
Rob Dauch
27W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
Brian Corley
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew Amrit
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Slava Zeif
16W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Wilbert Suggs
6W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.