Teams

Hopkins

2024 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Winter · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.20 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-03-20Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJoseph Jacangelo / Bill Malloy vs Tan Nguyen / Mike Oh2-6, 3-6
2024-02-13vs WHO IS WE?Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoseph Jacangelo / Bill Malloy vs Tusar Chhotaray / James Herbert0-6, 0-6
2024-01-29vs Stringing WinnersLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoseph Jacangelo / Tim Bowes vs Doan Nguyen / Luan Nguyen7-6, 1-5
2024-01-25vs Bluechip HP GroupLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoseph Jacangelo / Brian Nault vs Scott Davis / Paul Ebersole4-6, 0-6
2024-01-18vs WHO IS WE?Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEric Hopkins / Joseph Jacangelo vs Jesse Cebulash / Dante Paragas2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Jeffrey Gill
published
3.36
Jeffrey Schreibman
published
3.36
Eric Hopkins
published 3.5
3.34
Timothy DeCamp
published
3.03
Joseph Jacangelo
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.02
Brian Barnett
published 3.5
Andrew Lyons
published 3
2.75
Tim Bowes
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
Jacob Sultan
published
Nabil Ghadiali
published
Pete Ashley
published
Scott Sullivant
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Jacangelo + Tim Bowes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Gill
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
3.39
Jeffrey Schreibman
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Eric Hopkins
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
Timothy DeCamp
26W–30L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3
Joseph Jacangelo
153W–161L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
3.5
Brian Barnett
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Andrew Lyons
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Tim Bowes
34W–35L career · 7 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Jacob Sultan
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nabil Ghadiali
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pete Ashley
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Sullivant
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.