Teams

Tiong - Team Courtmasters

2025 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Winter · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.14 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-13vs Serve Aces- BowesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Parks / Gaurav Chikara vs Matt Whitfield / David Swank6-0, 7-5
2025-02-26vs Crenshaw - ChallengersWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Steinberg / Peter Winants vs Ahmad Salahuddin / Herlin Moscoso6-3, 7-5
2025-02-20vs Serve Aces- BowesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrian Creagh / David Parks vs Tim Bowes / KEVIN CUMMINGS6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGaurav Chikara / Peter Winants vs David Swank / Perry Zettersten2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesWallace Higginbotham / Michael Porturica vs Prashant Padmashali / Kazi Hassan4-6, 3-6
2025-02-02vs Crenshaw - ChallengersWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Porturica / David Parks vs Gene Chun / Sanjay Puttaraju6-1, 6-3
2025-01-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesWallace Higginbotham / Michael Porturica vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-01-26vs Serve Aces- BowesWon 10
W#2 DoublesYassen Shahansky / Peter Winants vs James Robberstad / Christopher Wulff6-3, 6-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Porturica / Gaurav Chikara vs Prashant Padmashali / Kazi Hassan1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Brian Creagh
published 3.5
3.19
Michael Porturica
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.08
David Parks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
3.02
Mark Jensen
published
2.88
2.88
Gaurav Chikara
published
2.88
Peter Winants
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Alberto Zuazo
published 3
2.82
John Cummins
published
2.73
Andrew Tsai
published 3
Joe Bhaktiar
published
John Steinberg
published
Tate Gould
published
Yassen Shahansky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Porturica + David Parks3258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brian Creagh
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Michael Porturica
82W–57L career · 7 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3
David Parks
76W–56L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Cristian Diaz Soria
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Mark Jensen
8W–20L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Wallace Higginbotham
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
2.88
Gaurav Chikara
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Peter Winants
30W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Alberto Zuazo
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
John Cummins
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Andrew Tsai
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Joe Bhaktiar
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Steinberg
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tate Gould
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yassen Shahansky
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.