Teams

Winner/Midtown - Hernandez

2024 Broward Adult 18 & Over ESL - Fall Day · 3.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.35 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-05vs Dillon - ThomasWon 30
W#1 SinglesGisela Coluccio vs Celeste Ellich6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMaritza Craig / Margaret Diaz vs Theoni Anagnostou / Virginia Paredes6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLedaliz Collazo / Giuliana Zunino-Ribas vs Jeannie Riggs / Gloria Felce7-5, 6-4
2023-11-30vs Veltri - ContrerasLost 12
L#1 DoublesJessika Bolin / Gisela Coluccio vs Linda Horta / Raeven Yester0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMilka Vignali vs Gloria Marquez6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesShamena Khan / Raquel de Jesus vs Julia Sturm / Virginia Siegel6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-11-02vs Veltri - ContrerasWon 10
W#3 DoublesGisela Coluccio / Jessika Bolin vs Mariana Rodriguez / Sara Contreras6-2, 6-0
2023-10-26vs Dillon - ThomasWon 30
W#1 DoublesGisela Coluccio / Jessika Bolin vs Wendy Calvet / Jessica Withum6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMilka Vignali / Patrizia Smouse-Gomez vs Theoni Anagnostou / Sue Mitchell-Greig6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMaritza Craig / Laura Hernandez vs Jeannie Riggs / Karen Scotti6-3, 6-1
2023-10-12vs Veltri - ContrerasWon 21
L#1 DoublesShamena Khan / Deborah Marshall vs Mariana Rodriguez / Jaimi Hinkle1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCarolina Rivera / Raquel de Jesus vs MONICA DONATO / Virginia Siegel6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGisela Coluccio / Patrizia Smouse-Gomez vs Lori Sobol / Julia Sturm7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2023-10-05vs Dillon - ThomasWon 20
W#1 DoublesLedaliz Collazo / Giuliana Zunino-Ribas vs Jessica Withum / Wendy Calvet6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShamena Khan / Raquel de Jesus vs Theoni Anagnostou / Jeannie Riggs6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Gisela Coluccio
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.54
Milka Vignali
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.41
Laura Hernandez
published
3.38
MARIANA DURANTE
published
3.30
Geraldine Fuentes
published 3.5
3.29
Stacy Havens
published
3.29
Romina Fattore
published
3.19
Carolina Rivera
published 3.5
3.14
ESPERANZA STILLO
published 3.5
3.10
Ledaliz Collazo
published
3.08
Raquel de Jesus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Shamena Khan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Jessika Bolin
published
2.85
Maritza Craig
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Giuliana Zunino-Ribas
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.80
Patrizia Smouse-Gomez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Michelle Pellow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessika Bolin + Shamena Khan9163% games+10.8% vs expected
Milka Vignali + Gisela Coluccio24566% games−0.0% vs expected
Maritza Craig + Milka Vignali15657% games−0.8% vs expected
Patrizia Smouse-Gomez + Gisela Coluccio24269% gamesnot enough data
Shamena Khan + Raquel de Jesus10357% gamesnot enough data
Maritza Craig + Patrizia Smouse-Gomez7551% gamesnot enough data
Patrizia Smouse-Gomez + Milka Vignali8360% gamesnot enough data
Shamena Khan + Giuliana Zunino-Ribas3353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gisela Coluccio
182W–52L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Milka Vignali
184W–82L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
Laura Hernandez
13W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.41
MARIANA DURANTE
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Geraldine Fuentes
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Stacy Havens
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.29
Romina Fattore
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Carolina Rivera
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
ESPERANZA STILLO
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
Ledaliz Collazo
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Raquel de Jesus
66W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Shamena Khan
133W–140L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
Jessika Bolin
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Maritza Craig
113W–117L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Giuliana Zunino-Ribas
61W–91L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Patrizia Smouse-Gomez
90W–46L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
Michelle Pellow
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.