Teams

Roland/Knoxville

2026 Combo 18 & Over- Knoxville · 5.5 Women Combo Doubles

15 players · average NTRP 2.80 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 10 6:15 PM
Tyson Family Tennis Center
Sep 19 2:15 PM
vs N/A
Elsa Roland
Sep 24 6:15 PM
Tyson Family Tennis Center
Sep 26 9:00 AM
West Hills Tennis Center
Oct 1 6:15 PM
vs N/A
Elsa Roland
Oct 3 10:45 AM
Tyson Family Tennis Center
2026-08-15vs Gomes/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnessa Savici / Jennifer Mendoza vs Jenna Gomes / Krista McIntosh4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHannah Frame / Cheri Arnsdorff vs Brook Park / Molly Teague6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesWyeshia Edwards / Heather McKeehan vs Erin Accardi / Laura Brumit7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women Combo Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Anessa Savici
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Sarah Olesiuk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Heather McKeehan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Courtney Dyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Elsa Roland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Katherine Goodner
published
2.65
Paula Stand
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Hannah Frame
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Annabel Sims
published 3
2.59
Rebecca Bender
published
2.51
Jennifer Mendoza
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Caroline Khoury
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.39
Cheri Arnsdorff
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.31
Natalia Ward
published
2.29
Keri Brill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elsa Roland + Rebecca Bender6072% games+18.4% vs expected
Cheri Arnsdorff + Jennifer Mendoza8271% games+16.2% vs expected
Keri Brill + Annabel Sims314 matchesnot enough data
Paula Stand + Elsa Roland213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anessa Savici
26W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Sarah Olesiuk
28W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Heather McKeehan
21W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Courtney Dyer
22W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Elsa Roland
47W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%5%95%
2.73
Katherine Goodner
7W–8L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Paula Stand
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
Hannah Frame
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Annabel Sims
28W–12L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Rebecca Bender
23W–6L career · no lines in 2026
0%26%74%
2.59
Jennifer Mendoza
24W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
2.5
Caroline Khoury
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Cheri Arnsdorff
31W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
Natalia Ward
9W–12L career · no lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Keri Brill
11W–18L career · no lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.