Teams

HRAC-Carter

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 WOMEN

4 players · average NTRP 3.88 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
JENNIFER BELOY
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published 4
3.79
Keely Kopetz
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 4
3.70
Mary Klinger
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 4
3.38
Allison Crisp
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2024-08-24Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKerry Spajic / Allison Crisp vs Paula Vollers / Karen Schmid6-3, 6-4
2024-08-23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAspen McKenna / Allison Crisp vs Hong Huynh / Ren Toshié Miura7-6, 6-4
2024-04-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAllison Crisp / Tammy Carter vs Annette Rose / Allison Atkinson6-3, 6-1
2024-04-19Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAllison Crisp / Tammy Carter vs Laura Cremers / Tracie Kuka6-2, 6-1
2024-03-16Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAllison Crisp / Katherine Karlson vs Anne Rojan / Marcie Ehlis6-3, 6-4
2024-03-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Marcille / Allison Crisp vs Megan Miller / Melanie Redding7-6, 6-2
2024-03-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesTammy Carter / Allison Crisp vs Erica Clontz / Kristy Peacock7-6, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
JENNIFER BELOY
100W–45L career
0%99%1%
3.79
4
Keely Kopetz
58W–43L career
0%99%1%
3.79
4
Mary Klinger
221W–142L career
2%98%0%
3.70
3.5
Allison Crisp
34W–39L career
0%93%7%
3.38

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.