Teams

PRKR YELLOW

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-09-17vs PRC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesJudy Jackson / Jonna Mulqueen vs Sujata Wagh / Christie Dyer7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-28vs HRCA-S BLACKLost 03
L#1 DoublesCathy Kerkhove / Judy Jackson vs Katherine Flecky / Lisa Walko1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRebecca Coakley vs Tanya Cote1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJonna Mulqueen / Kim Vaughan vs Kimberly Bevill / Cherie Weren3-6, 5-7
2023-08-21vs CACI REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesCathy Kerkhove / Kim Vaughan vs Kristen Arsenault / Melinda Conover4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Kobayashi / Rebecca Coakley vs Georgina Swales / Jennifer Benson4-6, 2-6
2023-08-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesRebecca Coakley / Heidi Lewis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-24vs HRCA-S BLACKLost 01
L#2 DoublesCathy Kerkhove / Jonna Mulqueen vs Kathy Dudek / Nantida Hong3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jonna Mulqueen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Ann Siebert
published 3.5
3.29
Cathy Kerkhove
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Judy Jackson
published
3.15
Rebecca Coakley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Kim Vaughan
published
3.10
Leslie Henderson
published
3.03
Heidi Lewis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Coakley + Heidi Lewis61147% games+3.2% vs expected
Cathy Kerkhove + Leslie Henderson5553% games−0.2% vs expected
Cathy Kerkhove + Judy Jackson7351% games−1.9% vs expected
Cathy Kerkhove + Rebecca Coakley224 matchesnot enough data
Kim Vaughan + Leslie Henderson224 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Kerkhove + Jonna Mulqueen123 matchesnot enough data
Judy Jackson + Leslie Henderson033 matchesnot enough data
Ann Siebert + Leslie Henderson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jonna Mulqueen
106W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Ann Siebert
13W–27L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Cathy Kerkhove
98W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Judy Jackson
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Rebecca Coakley
59W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Kim Vaughan
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Leslie Henderson
12W–21L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Heidi Lewis
9W–21L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.