Teams

It Takes a Village

2025 40&Over Men · 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-17vs The Village EldersWon 30
W#1 DoublesRoy Scinta / Gabriel Cacheiro vs Ronald Cummins / David Daniels6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTim Hussar / Kevin McCarthy vs Akash Parashar / Oliver Hays6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMatthew Venhaus / Fredrick Hazzan vs David Rogala / Timothy Smith7-5, 6-1
2025-07-10vs The Village EldersLost 12
L#1 DoublesGeorge Socco / Craig Mahalic vs Robert Forsberg / David Rogala0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMatthew Venhaus vs Nick Melson6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJavid Rzayev / Fraser Sim vs Akash Parashar / Oliver Hays1-6, 2-6
2025-06-23vs The Village EldersWon 31
L#1 DoublesFredrick Hazzan / Roy Scinta vs Akash Parashar / Oliver Hays0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesGabriel Cacheiro vs David Rogala2-0
W#2 DoublesKevin Lickers / Tim Hussar vs David Daniels / Robert Forsberg4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGeorge Socco / Matthew Venhaus vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-11vs The Village EldersWon 30
W#1 DoublesRoy Scinta / Fredrick Hazzan vs Akash Parashar / Timothy Smith6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGabriel Cacheiro vs Santiago Navarro6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKevin Lickers / Kevin McCarthy vs David Daniels / David Rogala6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-06-04vs The Village EldersWon 21
W#1 DoublesGabriel Cacheiro / Roy Scinta vs Santiago Navarro / David Daniels6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKevin Lickers vs David Rogala6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTim Hussar / Craig Mahalic vs Akash Parashar / Robert Forsberg1-6, 2-6
2025-05-27vs The Village EldersWon 30
W#1 DoublesGabriel Cacheiro / Roy Scinta vs Timothy Smith / Oliver Hays6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKevin Lickers vs Akash Parashar7-6, 5-4
W#3 DoublesFredrick Hazzan / Kevin McCarthy vs David Daniels / Robert Forsberg6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1It Takes a Village5118614142
2The Village Elders1542040253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Roy Scinta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
George Socco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Fredrick Hazzan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Craig Mahalic
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Gabriel Cacheiro
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.71
Tim Hussar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Fraser Sim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Javid Rzayev
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Lickers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Matthew Venhaus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Michael Feehan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriel Cacheiro + Roy Scinta8163% games+5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roy Scinta
25W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.11
3
George Socco
26W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Fredrick Hazzan
8W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Craig Mahalic
2W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Gabriel Cacheiro
10W–1L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tim Hussar
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
2.5
Fraser Sim
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%42%58%
2.53
Javid Rzayev
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Lickers
7W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Venhaus
8W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Feehan
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.