Teams

GOLD RIVER RC 55MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX7.0

25 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 55&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Laurie Schofield
published
3.83
Tony Karren
published
3.83
Patrick Dorais
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Laura Morales
published
3.58
Vivi Zhang
published
3.57
Kellie Patterson
published
3.53
Irenessa Oliva
published
3.51
Timothy Kirn
published
3.50
Scott Heisler
published
3.49
Rick Ray
published
3.47
Ann Gudmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Lori Anderson
published
3.40
Greg Cho
published
3.37
Katrin Chutka
published
3.30
Janelle Schultz
published
3.26
Mylene Tiongco
published
3.26
Molly Huckabay
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Rommel Llanes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Dale Patton
published 3.5
2.98
Peter Sarantis
published
2.96
Peter Jaskowiak
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Gary Shi
published
2.79
Jay Gokul
published
Gina Fong
published
Joe Morales
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mylene Tiongco + Rommel Llanes6158% games+20.1% vs expected
Irenessa Oliva + Greg Cho404 matchesnot enough data
Greg Cho + Vivi Zhang213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Schofield
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Tony Karren
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.83
Patrick Dorais
28W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Laura Morales
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Vivi Zhang
24W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
Kellie Patterson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Irenessa Oliva
41W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Timothy Kirn
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Scott Heisler
27W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Rick Ray
15W–25L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Ann Gudmann
17W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Lori Anderson
20W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Greg Cho
34W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Katrin Chutka
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Janelle Schultz
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Mylene Tiongco
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Molly Huckabay
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Rommel Llanes
26W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Dale Patton
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Peter Sarantis
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Peter Jaskowiak
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Gary Shi
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Jay Gokul
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Gina Fong
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joe Morales
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.