Teams

Larimer/18/8.5/Combo/WN/OCC

2026 LAF Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 8.5 Laf (18&O) Women Night

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-25vs Dugas/18/8.5/Combo/WNCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Payton / Janice Searle vs Lauren Breaux / Jeanne Marie Savoy2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Rust / Ruth Larimer vs Lauren Harris / Tammi Robicheaux7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Bourgeois / Julie Allen vs Courtney Dugas / Rachel Dunphy6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-08-18vs Dugas/18/8.5/Combo/WNCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAshley Rust / Jennifer Guilbeaux vs Lauren Breaux / Jeanne Marie Savoy4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Wong / Mary Beth McElligott vs Courtney Dugas / Sherry Wilson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKimmie Cormier / Ruth Larimer vs Holly Hagle / Rachel Dunphy6-1, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Laf (18&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Christine Payton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Lauren Bourgeois
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Keri Delhomme
published
4.10
Ashley Rust
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.06
Kimmie Cormier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Jennifer Guilbeaux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Mary Beth McElligott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Ruth Larimer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
Nicole Bergeron
published
3.65
Tonya Anderson
published
Lauren Wong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Rust + Lauren Bourgeois7255% games−4.2% vs expected
Christine Payton + Ruth Larimer134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christine Payton
24W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
Lauren Bourgeois
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
4.18
Keri Delhomme
7W–10L career · no lines in 2026
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Ashley Rust
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.10
Kimmie Cormier
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
31%69%<1%
4.06
Jennifer Guilbeaux
26W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%39%61%
4.04
Mary Beth McElligott
23W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
Ruth Larimer
22W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.71
Nicole Bergeron
25W–18L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Tonya Anderson
22W–19L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
Lauren Wong
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.