← Teams

MAC-Martinez/Clark

2023 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4.05 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Shannon Bilstrom
published 4.5
3.87
Darci Keljo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.84
Brooke Burnett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
—
Kim Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Michaela Bancud
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Heidi Clark
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.63
James Ringelberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Geraldine Carter
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.57
Thomas Turnbull
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.18
Rudy Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.17
Zachary Wright
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-11-20Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesJames Ringelberg / Kim Stevens vs Minou Chau / John Crouter7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesThomas Turnbull / Geraldine Carter vs Susan Ford / Alan Jones7-5, 6-3
2022-11-19Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesChristopher Graham / Darci Keljo vs Rie Sasakawa / Neil Soiffer6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGeraldine Carter / Rudy Martinez vs Angie Lee / Igor Landais6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesThomas Turnbull / Kim Stevens vs Joseph Didner / Flor Harrigan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-11-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesHeidi Clark / Zachary Wright vs Mary Klinger / Adam Gamboa6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGeraldine Carter / Christopher Graham vs Gabriela McIntosh / Matt Simmering6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichaela Bancud / Rudy Martinez vs Danielle Cuenco / Scott Reis6-1, 6-2
2022-11-05Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesJohn Hall / Michaela Bancud vs Christian Ostbo / Michele O'Brien6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesThomas Turnbull / Kim Stevens vs Jonathan Caplan / Andrea Findley2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-30Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRudy Martinez / Geraldine Carter vs Quanwang Wei / Kristen Benkstein6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesZachary Wright / Heidi Clark vs Tochukwu George / Kayleen Mendenhall6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristopher Graham / Michaela Bancud vs Gabriel Weaver / Shannon Roarke3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-15Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesRudy Martinez / Darci Keljo vs D'Arcy Martin / Michele Snyder7-5, 6-4
2022-10-02Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesRudy Martinez / Shannon Bilstrom vs Jennifer Tran / Bradley Sumoge6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesChristopher Graham / Brooke Burnett vs Kyle Cavelti / Lindsey Kahler6-2, 6-3
2022-09-18Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesRudy Martinez / Geraldine Carter vs Yuko Hopman / Kenya Reutin6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesZachary Wright / Heidi Clark vs Atom Fjeldsted / Hasol Yu6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Shannon Bilstrom
13W–21L career
not enough data
—
4
Darci Keljo
55W–36L career
0%97%3%
3.87
4.5
Brooke Burnett
23W–27L career · type A
56%44%0%
3.84
4
Kim Stevens
56W–44L career
not enough data
—
4
Michaela Bancud
26W–50L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Heidi Clark
42W–52L career
86%14%0%
3.70
4
James Ringelberg
73W–77L career
8%92%0%
3.63
4
Geraldine Carter
29W–28L career
20%80%1%
3.61
4
Thomas Turnbull
86W–92L career
16%84%0%
3.57
3.5
Rudy Martinez
45W–105L career
3%97%0%
3.18
3.5
Zachary Wright
177W–142L career
3%97%0%
3.17

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.