Teams

Tennis Addicts

2026 Corpus Christi 40 & Over USTA Mixed League · 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-09vs Backhand BanditsLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Jordan / Michelle Jordan vs Angie Britton / Jesse Ibarra5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Rivera / Rachel Rivera vs Jason Hawkins / Viv Ibarra6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKenneth Dalton / Katherine Read vs Jinlong Wang / Noemi Vasquez4-6, 4-6
2026-05-31vs Serve it UpLost 12
W#1 DoublesSonja Edwards / Michael Rivera vs Esmeralda Dean / Jonathan Martinez7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichelle Jordan / Daniel Jordan vs Brenda Escutia Woods / Vicente Morin2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJessica Fitch / Kenneth Dalton vs Dana Allen / Michael Griffin7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-17vs Backhand BanditsLost 12
W#1 DoublesSonja Edwards / Michael Rivera vs Jinlong Wang / Noemi Vasquez6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDaniel Jordan / Michelle Jordan vs Daniel Rodriguez / Amy Wallace5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Ehlen / Davey Edwards vs Angie Britton / Jesse Ibarra0-6, 1-6
2026-05-03vs Serve it UpLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristina Ehlen / Michael Rivera vs Vicki Jamison / Paul Jamison2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Jordan / Kenneth Dalton vs Dana Allen / Michael Griffin2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRachel Rivera / Davey Edwards vs Beki Hall / Vicente Morin0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Serve it Up409311104
2Backhand Bandits227510106
3Tennis Addicts0421020142

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Daniel Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Michael Rivera
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
2.76
Sonja Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Christina Ehlen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Davey Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Jessica Fitch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Katherine Read
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Rachel Rivera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kenneth Dalton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Daniel Jordan
12W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Michael Rivera
7W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Beatrice Villarreal
24W–44L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Sonja Edwards
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Christina Ehlen
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Davey Edwards
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jessica Fitch
11W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Katherine Read
13W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.34
Rachel Rivera
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Kenneth Dalton
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.