Teams

YMCA:Gagnon:Brown

2026 NH Adult 18 & Over Men · 3.0 Men 1

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-21vs MTS:Silver:Joslin-KingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSteeven Cajuste / Nicholas Brunet vs Barry Fougere / Narunas Bukauskas6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesWade Pelham vs Nathan Silver7-5, 6-4
2026-03-14vs MTS:Silver:Joslin-KingLost 01
L#1 SinglesWade Pelham vs Alper Gurses6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-07vs MTS:Silver:Joslin-KingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSteeven Cajuste / Leo Casado vs Ben Bailey / Paul Brock2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesWade Pelham vs Nishin Raj Kumblaparambil6-4, 6-1
2026-02-28vs MTS:Silver:Joslin-KingLost 01
L#1 SinglesSteeven Cajuste vs Nathan Silver4-6, 1-6
2026-02-07vs MTS:Silver:Joslin-KingWon 21
W#1 DoublesNicholas Brunet / A Eli Leino vs Paul Brock / Narunas Bukauskas6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesWade Pelham vs Alper Gurses4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSteeven Cajuste / Arcadio Alpuche vs Ben Bailey / Nishin Raj Kumblaparambil1-6, 4-6
2026-01-10vs MTS:Silver:Joslin-KingLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Norton / Lloyd Dagoc vs Paul Brock / Narunas Bukauskas4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesSteeven Cajuste vs Nathan Silver2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesNicholas Brunet / A Eli Leino vs Bob Cote / Edward David6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MTS:Silver:Joslin-King0613512118
2YMCA:Gagnon:Brown0651327185

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Wade Pelham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.90
A Eli Leino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Dan Gagnon
published 3
2.78
Nicholas Brunet
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Gil Becker
published
2.77
Lloyd Dagoc
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Steeven Cajuste
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.61
David Norton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wade Pelham
13W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
A Eli Leino
8W–10L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Dan Gagnon
10W–31L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Nicholas Brunet
11W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Gil Becker
19W–21L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Lloyd Dagoc
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Steeven Cajuste
4W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
David Norton
3W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
22%77%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.