Teams

Summit YMCA - Hogan

2025 SCTA Winter '25 - USTA Adult 55 & Over Women · Weekday Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-30vs Whitewater - Merritt & TilleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesGail Jones / Alicia Strickland vs Roxanne Shoemaker / Beth Willingham1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Hogan / Suzy Brown vs Peggy Forrest / Bonnie Jones3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKim Hinely / Patty Wright vs Margot Beebe / Carole Tilley3-6, 1-6
2025-04-23vs SCTA/Melissa OrmeLost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Jackson / Alicia Strickland vs Patricia Chapman / Juliet Skonberg2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGail Jones / Donna Heard vs Elizabeth Chadwick / Lesa Dugas4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Hogan / Suzy Brown vs Lisbeth Church / Susan Spradley3-6, 2-6
2025-04-16vs PTCTC - DavenportLost 12
W#1 DoublesDenise Jackson / Marianne DeBondt vs Bonnie Davidson / Donna Ann Flaherty6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTammy Whaley / Mischell Byers vs Gladys Walker / Buffie Davenport6-1, 4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPatty Wright / Gail Jones vs Mattie Smith / Victoria Wyatt1-6, 3-6
2025-04-09vs Whitewater - Merritt & TilleyLost 12
W#1 DoublesMischell Byers / Denise Jackson vs Beth Willingham / Roxanne Shoemaker5-7, 6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTammy Whaley / Linda Huband vs Vanessa Siguenza / Gayle Ardillo4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Hogan / Alicia Strickland vs Constance Ruddock / Daun Brown2-6, 3-6
2025-04-02vs SCTA/Melissa OrmeWon 21
W#1 DoublesDenise Jackson / Mischell Byers vs Patricia Chapman / Juliet Skonberg6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGail Jones / Kim Hinely vs Melissa Orme / Lais Saleh1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTammy Whaley / Linda Huband vs Lesa Dugas / Vicki Walker0-6, 6-4, 6-4
2025-03-26vs PTCTC - DavenportLost 12
W#1 DoublesDenise Jackson / Mischell Byers vs Bonnie Davidson / Serap Howard6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAlicia Strickland / Gail Jones vs Rayleen Monroe / Victoria Wyatt7-5, 0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Hogan / Donna Heard vs Gladys Walker / Mattie Smith1-6, 3-6
2025-03-19vs Whitewater - Merritt & TilleyLost 12
W#1 DoublesDenise Jackson / Mischell Byers vs Kathy Wilson / Bonnie Jones6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLinda Huband / Tammy Whaley vs Gayle Ardillo / Beth Willingham3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Heard / Carol Hogan vs Margot Beebe / Carole Tilley4-6, 1-6
2025-03-12vs SCTA/Melissa OrmeLost 12
W#1 DoublesDenise Jackson / Marianne DeBondt vs Elizabeth Chadwick / Maura Gair6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMischell Byers / Gail Jones vs Patricia Chapman / Lesa Dugas3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCarol Hogan / Linda Huband vs Lisbeth Church / Beth Warren4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Weekday Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Denise Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.13
Marianne DeBondt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Mischell Byers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Gail Jones
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.56
Kim Hinely
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Alicia Strickland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.46
Tammy Whaley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.42
Carol Hogan
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Donna Heard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Linda Huband
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Patty Wright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Jackson + Marianne DeBondt12657% games+5.9% vs expected
Mischell Byers + Denise Jackson5844% games+1.2% vs expected
Alicia Strickland + Gail Jones1440% games−7.4% vs expected
Carol Hogan + Alicia Strickland0615% gamesnot enough data
Denise Jackson + Carol Hogan044 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Whaley + Linda Huband123 matchesnot enough data
Mischell Byers + Marianne DeBondt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Denise Jackson
22W–25L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
Marianne DeBondt
23W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.13
Mischell Byers
16W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Gail Jones
4W–14L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Kim Hinely
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.56
3
Alicia Strickland
2W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
Tammy Whaley
1W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
3
Carol Hogan
3W–31L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.42
Donna Heard
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Huband
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patty Wright
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.