Teams

RCCB - Barto

2026 Brevard Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-31vs Kiwi - TuccioWon 30
W#1 DoublesTracey Drake / Robert Coker vs Julianne Moore / Tj Persicketti7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJanis Mena / SHANE BYRNE vs Thomas Hargrove / Mary Stoops2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Stallard / Thomas Stallard vs Christina M Tuccio / Paul Newman6-3, 6-1
2026-08-14vs Fee - DunnLost 12
L#1 DoublesSHANE BYRNE / Anne Barto vs Bruce Brothers / Laura Rouveyrol6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWilliam Lennan / Darlissa Salazar vs Andrew Toth / Cheryl Toth4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesThomas Stallard / Mary Stallard vs DeAnn Barksdale / Alan Cheung6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Tracey Drake
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Janis Mena
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
Patty Sellers
published
2.91
Larry Sellers
published
Anne Barto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Brenda Harris
published 3
Darlissa Salazar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Thomas Drake
published
2.70
Jared Sass
published
Mary Stallard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Coker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
SHANE BYRNE
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Thomas Stallard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
William Lennan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Stallard + Mary Stallard5945% gamesnot enough data
Patty Sellers + Larry Sellers2735% gamesnot enough data
Tracey Drake + Thomas Drake6159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracey Drake
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.07
3
Janis Mena
73W–58L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
Patty Sellers
49W–87L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
Larry Sellers
44W–65L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Anne Barto
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Brenda Harris
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Darlissa Salazar
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Drake
15W–10L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Jared Sass
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.70
Mary Stallard
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Coker
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
SHANE BYRNE
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Stallard
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
William Lennan
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.