Teams

GJTC MRIVEROS

2025 CTA ADULT 18-39 - WS · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - WS

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs GJTC NSNIDERWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesMegan Riveros / Mary Skrypiec vs Amanda Calvert / Sophia Knaysi6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 Female SinglesJordan Preuss vs Natasha Snider6-1, 6-1
2025-07-09vs GJTC NSNIDERWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesJordan Preuss / Mary Skrypiec vs Melissa Reams / Ashley Rossman6-3, 6-2
2025-07-07vs GJTC NSNIDERWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesMegan Riveros / Jordan Guray vs Melissa Reams / Ashley Rossman6-2, 6-1
W#1 Female SinglesJordan Preuss vs Amanda Calvert6-0, 6-2
2025-06-30vs GJTC NSNIDERWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMegan Riveros / Mary Skrypiec vs Amanda Calvert / Melissa Reams6-2, 6-4
2025-06-23vs GJTC NSNIDERWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesMary Skrypiec / Megan Riveros vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 Female DoublesJordan Preuss / Sara Barnes vs Melissa Reams / Ashley Rossman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-09vs GJTC NSNIDERWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesMegan Riveros vs Natasha Snider6-0, 6-2
2025-06-02vs GJTC NSNIDERWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesJordan Preuss / Mary Skrypiec vs Melissa Reams / Amanda Calvert6-3, 6-4
W#2 Female DoublesMegan Riveros / Jordan Guray vs Stephanie Bailey / Ashley Rossman6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - WS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GJTC MRIVEROS6116514138
2GJTC NSNIDER1641735226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Megan Riveros
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.02
Jerrilyn Palmer
published
3.01
Jordan Preuss
usually #1 Female Doubles 40%, also #1 Female Singles 40% · published 3
2.90
Mary Skrypiec
published
Jordan Guray
published
Sara Barnes
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Megan Riveros
49W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Jerrilyn Palmer
12W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.02
3
Jordan Preuss
52W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Mary Skrypiec
29W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
Jordan Guray
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Barnes
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.