Teams

Liberty Park-Causing a Racquet

2026 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 3.5W

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings12 teams · 3.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SM-Harris & the Serve-Ivors000000
2Sports Mall-Finlay000000
3Liberty Park-Causing a Racquet000000
4Park City MARC-Krueger/Siano000000
5SLTHC-Bayna000000
6Cottonwood-Haverkost/Nielsen000000
7SLTHC-Haroldsen/Leatham000000
8Liberty Park-Prince-Hagood/Kesler000000
9Trentman000000
10SunPro Advantage000000
11Spencer000000
12Sports Mall-Stroud-Peterson/Farr000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Hannah Lee
published
3.24
Jennifer Wecker
published
3.23
Jennie Stacey
published 3.5
3.22
Shannon Knudsen
published 3.5
3.19
Jennifer Tooley
published 3.5
3.19
Caitlin Lutsch
published 3.5
3.14
Kathi Poggi
published 3.5
3.11
Maryam Klock
published 3.5
3.07
Linda Lasater
published
3.04
Cortney Nebeker
published 3
3.04
2.93
Van Vo
published
2.88
Mary Sorensen
published
2.80
Hannah Galbreath
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Kawakami + Hannah Lee6162% games+11.2% vs expected
Linda Lasater + Van Vo4163% games+8.5% vs expected
Mary Sorensen + Linda Lasater8165% games+7.7% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Hannah Lee5258% games+4.9% vs expected
Mary Sorensen + Jennifer Kawakami11655% games+3.5% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Jennifer Wecker8163% games+1.7% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Shannon Knudsen171450% games+0.8% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Maryam Klock3447% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Lee
101W–74L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Jennifer Wecker
92W–47L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Jennie Stacey
153W–129L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Shannon Knudsen
22W–22L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Jennifer Tooley
197W–228L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Caitlin Lutsch
14W–6L career · type D · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Kathi Poggi
56W–42L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Maryam Klock
77W–91L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Linda Lasater
60W–29L career · no lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Cortney Nebeker
45W–26L career · no lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Jennifer Kawakami
52W–47L career · no lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
Van Vo
20W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Mary Sorensen
42W–45L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Hannah Galbreath
29W–28L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.