Teams

SLAFE-Feinberg/Bailey Double Trouble

Lake USTA 40 & Over Summer Singles · 3.0 Men Sunday 40+ Singles

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 SinglesDavid Peeler vs Erik Kopco0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAl Solis vs Gian Sarolli6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesSteve Lawson vs Mark Siler6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesNeil McLean vs John Holtz4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesSteve Lawson vs Erik Kopco6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAl Solis vs Jayendran Gopalsami6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAdam Lidgey vs Rocky Pavkov7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJeff Campbell vs David Wagner6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJeff Campbell vs Jayendran Gopalsami6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesNeil McLean vs David Wagner6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAl Solis vs Erik Kopco5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAdam Lidgey vs Rick Lazes6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTrey Ruff vs Mark Siler6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesDavid Peeler vs Gian Sarolli6-3, 6-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men Sunday 40+ Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SLAFE-Feinberg/Bailey Double Trouble4391226184
2SLEK-Kopco/Bailey Road Singles Men 40+ 3.0 Sunday1661532212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
William Cune
published 3
3.02
Adam Lidgey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.93
Steve Lawson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.89
Al Solis
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.81
Neil McLean
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.81
Trey Ruff
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.79
Jeff Campbell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.69
David Peeler
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.58
Adam Feinberg
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
William Cune
61W–41L career · no lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Adam Lidgey
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Steve Lawson
36W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Al Solis
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Neil McLean
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Trey Ruff
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Jeff Campbell
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
David Peeler
44W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Adam Feinberg
4W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.