Teams

Team 9 Party at the Net

2023 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAlisha Kim / Yong Jae Lee vs Stephen Gotts / Michelle Brown1-6, 3-6
2023-03-18vs Team 6 Match MakersWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlisha Kim / Yong Jae Lee vs Arvinderpal Narula / Nazarina Phommachanh6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSachi Pilkenton / Edson Gregory vs Ashwin Vengu / Monica Palacios6-3, 5-5
2023-03-11vs Team 3 BWBLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlbert Crenshaw / Yuri Miller vs Michael Chen / Na Yu3-6, 3-6
2023-02-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesYuri Miller / Ramon Mercado vs Mitchell Hailey / Kimberley Griffith2-6, 5-7
2023-01-30vs Team 12 RBGCC 7.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAlbert Crenshaw / Pilar Stack vs Damon Griggs / Emma Shine2-6, 1-6
2023-01-21vs Team 7 Smart AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesSachi Pilkenton / Justin Yu vs Kristi Nault / Brian Nault3-6, 6-7
2023-01-15vs Team 8 Play It ForwardSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAlisha Kim / Yong Jae Lee vs Cathy Huh / Phil Reed6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJin Kim / Yuri Miller vs Paul Lluy / Jennifer Graham2-6, 1-6
2023-01-08vs Team 5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStephanie Fultz / Albert Crenshaw vs Denise Weinig / Carter Wilkinson1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Alisha Kim
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Tom Oda
published
3.25
Joe Cassady
published
3.06
Sachi Pilkenton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Albert Crenshaw
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Jann Cassady
published
2.88
Stephanie Fultz
published
2.75
Yuri Miller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Rob Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Albert Crenshaw + Yuri Miller0630% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alisha Kim
66W–57L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.91
Tom Oda
59W–69L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
Joe Cassady
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
3.25
3.5
Sachi Pilkenton
69W–71L career · 2 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Albert Crenshaw
54W–159L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02
Jann Cassady
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
2.89
Stephanie Fultz
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.88
3
Yuri Miller
37W–105L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
Rob Wright
2W–14L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.