Teams

LA - Queen Anne

2022 SoCal Tri-Level - LA · LA - Women 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.56 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-02vs LA - MountainGateWon 10
W#1 DoublesGloria Geller / Liz Franco vs Emi Takemura Miller / Diana Carmichael6-0, 6-0
2022-09-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesGloria Geller / Liz Franco vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-11vs LA - Downtown AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesGloria Geller / Liz Franco vs Liesel Reinisch / Claudia Ibarra6-2, 6-2
2022-08-20vs LA - MountainGateWon 10
W#1 DoublesTara Shultz / Gloria Geller vs Jill Koenig / Christy Feinfield6-0, 6-1
2022-08-13vs LA - Shadow's AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesGloria Geller / Amanda Richardson vs Tracy Lee / Aram Hamidi6-3, 6-2
2022-08-07vs LA - Smash GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesGloria Geller / Liz Franco vs Sona Arutyunyan / Tiffany Lee3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-31vs LA - Tennis AddictsWon 10
W#2 DoublesGloria Geller / Amanda Richardson vs Vilayvanh Shah / Sona Arutyunyan6-0, 6-3
2022-07-24vs LA-LLW-Ace Angels-Yanti MolsingWon 10
W#1 DoublesGloria Geller / Tara Shultz vs Carol Ecker / Susan Raifman6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Gloria Geller
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4.5
3.87
Charlotte Gray
published 4
3.85
3.30
Graciela Gutierrez
published 3.5
3.29
Megan Abrigo
published
Jacqueline Espiritu
published 3.5
3.10
Claudine Shiva
published 3.5
3.00
2.83
Gillian Smith
published 3
2.76
2.68
Nyah Melton
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gloria Geller
139W–102L career · 8 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.17
4
Charlotte Gray
12W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Amanda Richardson
30W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
3.5
Graciela Gutierrez
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Megan Abrigo
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Jacqueline Espiritu
1W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Claudine Shiva
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Cinderella Gatcheco
49W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Gillian Smith
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Catherine Subagyo
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Nyah Melton
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.